Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ORVATEN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ORVATEN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02379156 ↗ Thermoregulation and Cognition During Cool Ambient Exposure in Tetraplegia Active, not recruiting The Craig H. Neilsen Foundation Phase 4 2015-04-01 The ability to maintain normal core body temperature (Tcore = 98.6°F) is impaired in persons with a cervical spinal cord injury (tetraplegia). Despite the known deficits in the ability of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) to maintain Tcore, and the effects of hypothermia to impair mental function in able-bodied (AB) persons, there has been no work to date addressing these issues in persons with tetraplegia. Primary Aim: To determine if exposure of up to 2 hours to cool temperatures (64°F) causes Tcore to decrease in persons with tetraplegia, and if that decrease is associated with a decrease in cognitive function. Primary Hypotheses: Based on our pilot data: (1) 66% of persons with tetraplegia and none of the matched controls will demonstrate a decline of 1.8°F in Tcore; (2) 80% of persons with tetraplegia and 30% of controls will have a decline of at least one T-score in Stroop Interference scores (a measure of executive function). Secondary Aim: To determine the change in: (1) distal skin temperature, (2) metabolic rate, and (3) thermal sensitivity. Secondary Hypothesis: Persons with tetraplegia will have less of a percent change in average distal skin temperatures and metabolic rate, and report lower thermal sensitivity ratings compared with AB controls. Tertiary Aim: To determine if a 10 mg dose of an approved blood pressure-raising medicine (midodrine hydrochloride) will (1) reduce the decrease in Tcore and (2) prevent or delay the decline in cognitive performance in the group with tetraplegia compared to the exact same procedures performed on the day with no medicine (Visit 1) in that same group. Tertiary Hypothesis: Through administering a one-time dose of midodrine, the medicine-induced decreased blood flow to the skin will lessen the decline in Tcore and prevent or delay the associated decline in cognitive performance compared to the changes in Tcore and cognitive performance during cool temperature exposure without midodrine in the same group with tetraplegia.
NCT02379156 ↗ Thermoregulation and Cognition During Cool Ambient Exposure in Tetraplegia Active, not recruiting James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center Phase 4 2015-04-01 The ability to maintain normal core body temperature (Tcore = 98.6°F) is impaired in persons with a cervical spinal cord injury (tetraplegia). Despite the known deficits in the ability of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) to maintain Tcore, and the effects of hypothermia to impair mental function in able-bodied (AB) persons, there has been no work to date addressing these issues in persons with tetraplegia. Primary Aim: To determine if exposure of up to 2 hours to cool temperatures (64°F) causes Tcore to decrease in persons with tetraplegia, and if that decrease is associated with a decrease in cognitive function. Primary Hypotheses: Based on our pilot data: (1) 66% of persons with tetraplegia and none of the matched controls will demonstrate a decline of 1.8°F in Tcore; (2) 80% of persons with tetraplegia and 30% of controls will have a decline of at least one T-score in Stroop Interference scores (a measure of executive function). Secondary Aim: To determine the change in: (1) distal skin temperature, (2) metabolic rate, and (3) thermal sensitivity. Secondary Hypothesis: Persons with tetraplegia will have less of a percent change in average distal skin temperatures and metabolic rate, and report lower thermal sensitivity ratings compared with AB controls. Tertiary Aim: To determine if a 10 mg dose of an approved blood pressure-raising medicine (midodrine hydrochloride) will (1) reduce the decrease in Tcore and (2) prevent or delay the decline in cognitive performance in the group with tetraplegia compared to the exact same procedures performed on the day with no medicine (Visit 1) in that same group. Tertiary Hypothesis: Through administering a one-time dose of midodrine, the medicine-induced decreased blood flow to the skin will lessen the decline in Tcore and prevent or delay the associated decline in cognitive performance compared to the changes in Tcore and cognitive performance during cool temperature exposure without midodrine in the same group with tetraplegia.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ORVATEN

Condition Name

Condition Name for ORVATEN
Intervention Trials
Hypothermia 1
Mild Cognitive Impairment 1
Tetraplegia 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ORVATEN
Intervention Trials
Quadriplegia 1
Mild Cognitive Impairment 1
Hypothermia 1
Cognitive Dysfunction 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ORVATEN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ORVATEN
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ORVATEN
Location Trials
New York 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ORVATEN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ORVATEN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ORVATEN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Active, not recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ORVATEN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ORVATEN
Sponsor Trials
The Craig H. Neilsen Foundation 1
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ORVATEN
Sponsor Trials
U.S. Fed 1
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Orvaten clinical trials update, market analysis and forecast: what to know about the product’s pipeline, uptake drivers, and revenue outlook

Last updated: July 28, 2026

No complete, verifiable market and clinical-trials dataset was provided for “orvaten” (drug identity, active ingredient, indication, FDA/EMA status, sponsor, dosage form, NCT trial IDs, and company financial base year). Without those inputs, an accurate clinical-trials update, patent/exclusivity framing, competitive landscape, and revenue projection cannot be produced.

What is Orvaten (drug identity, active ingredient, indication) and who makes it?

Answer: Insufficient information to identify the marketed product, active ingredient(s), indication(s), and manufacturer(s) for “Orvaten,” so no authoritative clinical-trials or market forecast can be compiled.

Which active ingredient does “Orvaten” refer to?

Answer: Not specified.

What dosage forms and routes are marketed or studied?

Answer: Not specified.

Is Orvaten FDA-approved, EMA-approved, or investigational?

Answer: Not specified.

What clinical trials are active for Orvaten (NCT status, phase, design, endpoints)?

Answer: Insufficient information to map “Orvaten” to a specific clinical trial program and enumerate NCT IDs, phase progression, primary endpoints, enrollment status, and results timelines.

Which phase is Orvaten in (Phase 1, 2, 3) and what are the readouts?

Answer: Not specified.

What are the key endpoints and inclusion criteria?

Answer: Not specified.

Are there registrational trials or pivotal studies?

Answer: Not specified.

When do Orvaten trials read out and when could approval occur?

Answer: Not specified, so no approval probability-weighted timeline can be stated.

What is the next expected data catalyst?

Answer: Not specified.

What regulatory pathway is being pursued (505(b)(2), 505(j), BLA, NDA, MAA)?

Answer: Not specified.

Is Orvaten positioned against standard of care or in combination?

Answer: Not specified.

What is the market opportunity for Orvaten (addressable population, pricing, penetration)?

Answer: Insufficient information to identify the indication and product profile, so no addressable population sizing or penetration curve can be justified.

How large is the treated population by geography and payer mix?

Answer: Not specified.

What is the expected launch price and net-to-gross assumptions?

Answer: Not specified.

What penetration drivers matter most (guideline placement, safety, administration, payer coverage)?

Answer: Not specified.

How does Orvaten compare with competing therapies (efficacy, safety, dosing, formulary position)?

Answer: Insufficient information on the mechanism of action, dosing regimen, and indication, so comparative performance cannot be evaluated.

What are the main competitors by class and molecule?

Answer: Not specified.

How does Orvaten’s administration and adherence profile affect uptake?

Answer: Not specified.

What are the expected differentiators (PK/PD, onset, durability, tolerability)?

Answer: Not specified.

What is the forecast revenue for Orvaten (base, bull, bear scenarios)?

Answer: Insufficient information to establish a credible revenue model without an identified indication, target patients, market share trajectory, pricing, and competition.

What launch-year adoption curve is assumed?

Answer: Not specified.

What uptake schedule by line of therapy is assumed?

Answer: Not specified.

What is the competitive and substitution risk during the forecast window?

Answer: Not specified.

What risks could delay or derail Orvaten (clinical, regulatory, IP, manufacturing)?

Answer: Not specified, so no specific risk register tied to the actual program can be produced.

What clinical risks exist (safety signals, efficacy underpowering, endpoint misses)?

Answer: Not specified.

What regulatory risks exist (CRL likelihood, label narrowing, REMS, postmarketing commitments)?

Answer: Not specified.

What commercial risks exist (payer pushback, channel inventory, competitor price pressure)?

Answer: Not specified.

Key Takeaways

Answer: Cannot be completed because “Orvaten” is not uniquely identified with the clinical and commercial facts needed to generate a defensible trials update and revenue forecast.

FAQs

  1. What is Orvaten’s mechanism of action and what indication is it targeting?
    Not specified.

  2. What phase 3 trial results are most likely to drive Orvaten approval?
    Not specified.

  3. Does Orvaten have orphan drug, breakthrough therapy, or priority review designations?
    Not specified.

  4. How much market share is Orvaten expected to capture at launch versus year 3?
    Not specified.

  5. What competitive barriers (tendering, formulary restrictions, switching costs) affect Orvaten uptake?
    Not specified.

References

No sources were cited because “Orvaten” was not sufficiently identified to support citation-backed claims.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.