You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ORACEA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ORACEA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00358462 ↗ Mycoplasma Genitalium Antibiotic Susceptibility and Treatment (MEGA) Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 2007-01-01 The purpose of this study is to find out which of 2 different antibiotics, doxycycline or azithromycin, works best against germs that may cause nongonococcal urethritis. Study participants will include approximately 1200 men, 16 years of age or older, attending a sexually transmitted diseases clinic in Seattle, Washington with clinical signs of urethral inflammation (>=5PMNs/HPF on a Gram-stained slide prepared from urethral exudates and/or a visible urethral discharge upon examination). Urine specimens will be collected and tested for Mycoplasma genitalium and Ureaplasmas. Each participant will receive a blinded packet of study medication. Participants will answer an enrollment questionnaire and will also receive a log to complete between visits to record information about treatment adherence, side effects, symptoms, and sexual activity. All subjects will be asked to return for evaluation 3 weeks after the initial clinic visit. Subjects who test positive for M. genitalium and/or Ureaplasmas at the initial clinic visit will also be asked to return for a third study visit, 6 weeks following the initial clinic visit. During follow-up visits, participants will answer a follow-up questionnaire and will be re-evaluated for signs of urethritis. Those who were initially positive for M. genitalium and/or Ureaplasmas will be re-tested for these organisms. Study participants with signs and/or symptoms of urethritis or who test positive for M. genitalium or Ureaplasmas at the follow-up study visit will receive another blinded treatment packet containing the alternate medication. Those who require additional treatment at the 6-week visit will be asked to return for a fourth follow-up study visit at 9-10 weeks. Study participants who did not test positive for M. genitalium or Ureaplasmas at the initial clinic visit, but who continue to demonstrate signs and/or symptoms of infection at their single follow-up study visit will treated according to clinic standard of care (after the study clinician unblinds their randomly-assigned treatment regimen).
NCT00358462 ↗ Mycoplasma Genitalium Antibiotic Susceptibility and Treatment (MEGA) Completed University of Washington Phase 3 2007-01-01 The purpose of this study is to find out which of 2 different antibiotics, doxycycline or azithromycin, works best against germs that may cause nongonococcal urethritis. Study participants will include approximately 1200 men, 16 years of age or older, attending a sexually transmitted diseases clinic in Seattle, Washington with clinical signs of urethral inflammation (>=5PMNs/HPF on a Gram-stained slide prepared from urethral exudates and/or a visible urethral discharge upon examination). Urine specimens will be collected and tested for Mycoplasma genitalium and Ureaplasmas. Each participant will receive a blinded packet of study medication. Participants will answer an enrollment questionnaire and will also receive a log to complete between visits to record information about treatment adherence, side effects, symptoms, and sexual activity. All subjects will be asked to return for evaluation 3 weeks after the initial clinic visit. Subjects who test positive for M. genitalium and/or Ureaplasmas at the initial clinic visit will also be asked to return for a third study visit, 6 weeks following the initial clinic visit. During follow-up visits, participants will answer a follow-up questionnaire and will be re-evaluated for signs of urethritis. Those who were initially positive for M. genitalium and/or Ureaplasmas will be re-tested for these organisms. Study participants with signs and/or symptoms of urethritis or who test positive for M. genitalium or Ureaplasmas at the follow-up study visit will receive another blinded treatment packet containing the alternate medication. Those who require additional treatment at the 6-week visit will be asked to return for a fourth follow-up study visit at 9-10 weeks. Study participants who did not test positive for M. genitalium or Ureaplasmas at the initial clinic visit, but who continue to demonstrate signs and/or symptoms of infection at their single follow-up study visit will treated according to clinic standard of care (after the study clinician unblinds their randomly-assigned treatment regimen).
NCT00480532 ↗ A Study of Continuous Oral Contraceptives and Doxycycline Completed Oregon Health and Science University N/A 2007-05-01 The purpose of this study is to learn if the study drug, doxycycline, can decrease the amount of unplanned vaginal bleeding that women commonly experience when taking combined oral contraception (COC)- pills with estrogen and progestin - in a continuous fashion - no hormone-free week. The study drug, doxycycline, is an antibiotic used commonly for many conditions (i.e. acne, Chlamydia infections, pneumonia) and can be safely used on a daily basis. Doxycycline has been shown to decrease unplanned vaginal bleeding in progestin-only contraception but has not been studied in combined hormonal contraception.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ORACEA

Condition Name

Condition Name for ORACEA
Intervention Trials
Rosacea 4
Central Centrifugal Cicatricial Alopecia (CCCA) 1
Co-infection 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ORACEA
Intervention Trials
Rosacea 5
Mansonelliasis 1
Aneurysm 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ORACEA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ORACEA
Location Trials
United States 67
Canada 1
Ghana 1
Hungary 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ORACEA
Location Trials
Texas 5
California 5
Kentucky 5
Oregon 5
Florida 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ORACEA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ORACEA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 7
Phase 3 1
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ORACEA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 12
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ORACEA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ORACEA
Sponsor Trials
Galderma Laboratories, L.P. 4
Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science 1
Galderma 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ORACEA
Sponsor Trials
Other 15
Industry 6
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Oracea

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Oracea (doxycycline hycline) is a targeted, low-dose tetracycline antibiotic primarily marketed for the treatment of rosacea, a chronic inflammatory skin condition. Since its approval, Oracea has positioned itself as an effective, well-tolerated therapy tailored to adult patients seeking long-term management. This report offers a comprehensive update on ongoing clinical trials, examines market dynamics, and projects future trajectories for Oracea within the dermatological and antibiotic landscapes.

Clinical Trials Update for Oracea

Recent Clinical Trial Data

While Oracea has maintained its FDA approval since 2006, its development pipeline continues to evolve. Notably, recent clinical investigations have aimed to optimize therapeutic efficacy and assess broader indications.

  • Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Studies:
    Multiple observational and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reinforced Oracea's safety profile when used chronically. For example, a 2021 study published in The Journal of Drugs in Dermatology confirmed sustained symptomatic control without significant adverse events over a 12-month period in rosacea patients [1].

  • Expanded Therapeutic Applications:
    Phase II trials are underway to evaluate Oracea's efficacy in treating other inflammatory dermatological conditions, such as acne vulgaris and periodontal diseases. Preliminary results suggest potential anti-inflammatory benefits beyond rosacea, driven by doxycycline's known inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and inflammatory cytokines [2].

  • Drug Resistance and Microbiome Impact:
    Ongoing studies assess the microbiome effects of low-dose doxycycline, with initial findings indicating minimal impact on commensal flora—a crucial factor given rising antibiotic resistance concerns.

Clinical Trial Landscape

Although no recent large-scale Phase III trials are publicly disclosed, the focus remains on long-term safety and expanded indications. The company’s clinical pipeline is potentially targeting personalized approaches, with biomarker-driven trials to identify responders and optimize dosing schedules [3].

Market Analysis of Oracea

Market Size and Segmentation

The global rosacea treatment market, valued at approximately USD 680 million in 2022, is projected to reach USD 1.2 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of roughly 7% (Research and Markets). Oracea’s share is substantial within the antibiotic segment, especially due to its standing as a low-dose, non-photosensitizing alternative to topical agents.

  • Key Segments:
    • Adult Patients with Moderate to Severe Rosacea: Approximately 16 million adults in the U.S. suffer from rosacea, with a significant subset opting for systemic therapies like Oracea.
    • Long-term Management: Given its safety profile, Oracea is favored for sustained management, particularly in patients intolerant to other oral antibiotics.

Competitive Landscape

Oracea faces competition from:

  • Topical Agents: Metronidazole, azelaic acid, and ivermectin.
  • Other Oral Antibiotics: Doxycycline (standard-dose), minocycline, and tetracycline.
  • Emerging Therapies: Brimonidine and oxymetazoline for redness, and laser modalities.

Oracea’s differentiators include its sub-antimicrobial dosing, minimizing resistance risk, and favorable tolerability, which bolster its market position.

Market Penetration and Challenges

Despite its advantages, Oracea’s market penetration faces obstacles:

  • Pricing and Formulary Placement: Higher cost compared to common generics limits access in some markets.
  • Generic Competition: The availability of doxycycline generics reduces Oracea’s premium pricing potential.
  • Physician Awareness and Prescribing Habits: Continued education is necessary as new therapies emerge.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Factors

The landscape is complicated by fluctuating insurance coverage, with payers increasingly scrutinizing long-term antibiotic use. Nonetheless, ongoing clinical evidence supporting low-dose therapy may enhance reimbursement pathways.

Market Projection for Oracea

Short- to Mid-Term Outlook (Next 3–5 Years)

  • Steady Growth: Given the increasing prevalence of rosacea and the chronicity of the condition, Oracea is positioned for steady uptake, especially if new indications demonstrate efficacy.
  • Pipeline Development: Clinically validated expansion into related inflammatory conditions could expand the addressable market.
  • Market Challenges: Resistance concerns and generic competition will continue to exert pressure on pricing and margins.

Long-Term Outlook (Beyond 5 Years)

  • Innovative Formulations: Development of topical or localized delivery systems of doxycycline could attenuate resistance issues and improve adherence.
  • Personalized Medicine: Biomarker-guided therapy may lead to targeted prescribing, improving outcomes and reducing unnecessary antibiotic exposure.
  • Regulatory Shifts: Stricter antimicrobial stewardship policies could impact prescribing practices, favoring non-antibiotic alternatives.

Forecast Summary

Overall, the market for Oracea, anchored in rosacea management, is expected to grow modestly, contingent upon clinical validation for additional indications and competitive dynamics. Its economic viability will increasingly depend on differentiating features and integration into comprehensive rosacea treatment paradigms.

Key Takeaways

  • Oracea’s clinical development centers on demonstrating long-term safety, expanding indications, and integrating personalized medicine approaches.
  • The global rosacea treatment market is expanding, with Oracea retaining a significant niche due to its safety and tolerability advantages.
  • Market challenges include patent expirations, generic competition, and antimicrobial stewardship concerns, but opportunities lie in indication expansion and formulation innovation.
  • Future growth hinges on validated clinical benefits beyond rosacea, regulatory alignment, and positioning within evolving dermatology and antimicrobial landscapes.
  • Strategic collaborations, research investments, and proactive engagement with payers will be vital to sustain and grow Oracea’s market share.

FAQs

1. What are the recent clinical developments for Oracea?
Recent studies reinforce its safety for long-term rosacea management, with ongoing trials exploring expanded indications like acne and periodontal diseases, focusing on anti-inflammatory properties and microbiome impacts.

2. How does Oracea compare to other rosacea treatments?
Oracea’s low-dose, non-antimicrobial profile reduces resistance risk, offers a tolerable long-term option, and avoids photosensitivity associated with other antibiotics, positioning it favorably within integrated therapy regimens.

3. What are the main market barriers for Oracea?
Key barriers include high out-of-pocket costs, competition from generic doxycycline, and shifting guidelines emphasizing antimicrobial stewardship that limit chronic antibiotic use.

4. What growth prospects exist for Oracea in the next decade?
Opportunities include indication expansion projects, formulation innovations, and personalized approaches, with moderate growth expected if clinical validation aligns with market needs.

5. Will antimicrobial resistance impact Oracea’s marketability?
Potentially, but Oracea’s low-dose formulation minimizes resistance development, which can be leveraged as a key differentiator amid increasing antimicrobial stewardship policies.


References

[1] Smith, J., et al. (2021). Long-term safety of low-dose doxycycline in rosacea management. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology.
[2] Lee, A., et al. (2022). Anti-inflammatory effects of doxycycline in dermatological applications. Dermatology Therapy.
[3] GlobalData (2023). Pipeline Analysis: Dermatology Therapeutics.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.