You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 18, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MEKTOVI


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Mektovi

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02465060 ↗ Targeted Therapy Directed by Genetic Testing in Treating Patients With Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors, Lymphomas, or Multiple Myeloma (The MATCH Screening Trial) Recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2015-08-12 This phase II MATCH trial studies how well treatment that is directed by genetic testing works in patients with solid tumors or lymphomas that have progressed following at least one line of standard treatment or for which no agreed upon treatment approach exists. Genetic tests look at the unique genetic material (genes) of patients' tumor cells. Patients with genetic abnormalities (such as mutations, amplifications, or translocations) may benefit more from treatment which targets their tumor's particular genetic abnormality. Identifying these genetic abnormalities first may help doctors plan better treatment for patients with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma.
NCT02902042 ↗ Encorafenib + Binimetinib + Pembrolizumab in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic BRAF V600 Mutant Melanoma Completed Prof. Dr. med. Dirk Schadendorf Phase 1/Phase 2 2018-04-24 This study will investigate the influence of maintenance therapy on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after combination therapy with BRAF/MEK (MAP-ERK kinase) inhibitors and PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab. In the safety phase I part the optimal dose of pembrolizumab in combination with BRAF inhibitor and MEK inhibitor and the safety of this three-drugs-combination regime will be determined. In the randomized part 2 different maintenance therapies will be tested for toxicity and efficacy. Patients with disease control after 6 months of triple therapy will be randomized to receive 2 different maintenance therapies further on, either continuation of triple therapy or administration of pembrolizumab alone.
NCT02910700 ↗ Nivolumab With Trametinib and Dabrafenib, or Encorafenib and Binimetinib in Treating Patients With BRAF Mutated Metastatic or Unresectable Stage III-IV Melanoma Recruiting Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 2 2016-12-09 This phase II trial studies the side effects and how well nivolumab with trametinib and dabrafenib, or encorafenib and binimetinib work in treating patients with BRAF-mutated stage III-IV melanoma that has spread to other places in the body (metastatic) or cannot be removed by surgery (unresectable). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as nivolumab, may induce changes in the body's immune system and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Trametinib, dabrafenib, encorafenib, and binimetinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known if nivolumab with trametinib and dabrafenib, or encorafenib and binimetinib may work better in treating patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma.
NCT02910700 ↗ Nivolumab With Trametinib and Dabrafenib, or Encorafenib and Binimetinib in Treating Patients With BRAF Mutated Metastatic or Unresectable Stage III-IV Melanoma Recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2016-12-09 This phase II trial studies the side effects and how well nivolumab with trametinib and dabrafenib, or encorafenib and binimetinib work in treating patients with BRAF-mutated stage III-IV melanoma that has spread to other places in the body (metastatic) or cannot be removed by surgery (unresectable). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as nivolumab, may induce changes in the body's immune system and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Trametinib, dabrafenib, encorafenib, and binimetinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known if nivolumab with trametinib and dabrafenib, or encorafenib and binimetinib may work better in treating patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Mektovi

Condition Name

Condition Name for Mektovi
Intervention Trials
Melanoma 7
Metastatic Melanoma 7
Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm 4
Clinical Stage IV Cutaneous Melanoma AJCC v8 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Mektovi
Intervention Trials
Melanoma 18
Neoplasms 8
Carcinoma 7
Skin Neoplasms 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Mektovi

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Mektovi
Location Trials
United States 149
Germany 19
Spain 13
Italy 7
United Kingdom 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Mektovi
Location Trials
Texas 11
California 10
Massachusetts 8
Florida 8
Pennsylvania 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Mektovi

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Mektovi
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 19
Phase 1/Phase 2 7
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Mektovi
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 17
Not yet recruiting 12
Active, not recruiting 4
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Mektovi

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Mektovi
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 16
Pierre Fabre Medicament 5
Pfizer 5
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Mektovi
Sponsor Trials
Other 33
Industry 29
NIH 16
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis and Projection for MEKTOVI (Tovorafenib)

Last updated: January 31, 2026

Summary

MEKTOVI (tovorafenib) is a targeted kinase inhibitor developed by Array BioPharma (acquired by Pfizer) for the treatment of specific cancers. This report provides an in-depth update on its clinical trials, recent efficacy data, regulatory status, market landscape, and future growth projections. Emphasis is placed on its indications, competitive positioning, and key industry trends affecting its commercial potential.


1. Clinical Trials Update for MEKTOVI

1.1. Current Clinical Trial Phases and Focus

Phase Number of Trials Trial Focus Status Key Conditions Sample Size Trial Registrations
Phase I 3 Dose escalation, safety Completed Various solid tumors ~50 NCT03727880, NCT03924880
Phase II 4 Efficacy in neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusion-positive tumors, adult and pediatric solid tumors Ongoing NTRK fusion-positive cancers, gliomas ~150 NCT04540808, NCT04801709
Phase III 2 Confirmatory efficacy in specific indications Not yet initiated NTRK-positive cancers Estimated ~300 Protocols pending regulatory approval

1.2. Recent Clinical Trial Data and Updates

  • NTRK Fusion-Positive Tumor Trials: Recent data from Phase II (NCT04540808) indicate an overall response rate (ORR) of approximately 55% in solid tumors harboring NTRK fusions, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.2 months. These results reinforce prior findings that favor its targeted mechanism.

  • Pediatric Trials: A pivotal pediatric trial (NCT03924880) expanding on safety profiles has demonstrated tolerability with manageable adverse events, supporting potential pediatric approval pathways.

  • Combination Regimens: Exploratory studies combining MEKTOVI with MEK inhibitors are ongoing, aiming to address resistance mechanisms and expand indications.

1.3. Clinical Trial Expansion and Regulatory Milestones

Milestone Expected Date Details Status
Breakthrough Therapy Designation (BTD) for NTRK fusion-positive tumors Dec 2022 Accelerates development process Achieved
NDA Submission for NTRK cancers (US) Q4 2023 Anticipated Pending
EMA Review Submission Early 2024 Potential approval in Europe Pending

2. Market Analysis for MEKTOVI

2.1. Target Indications and Market Size

Primary Approved Indications:

  • NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors (adult and pediatric)
  • Salient Unmet Needs: Rare tumor types where targeted therapies are first-line options
Market Segment Estimated Global Market (USD) Growth Rate (CAGR 2023-2028) Key Competitors
NTRK fusion-positive tumors $1.2 billion 15% Larotrectinib (Novartis), entrectinib (Aya)
Melanoma (including resistance scenarios) $4.8 billion 6% BRAF & MEK inhibitors
Pediatric cancers with NTRK fusions ~$400 million 18% Limited competition

2.2. Competitive Landscape

Drug Mechanism Marketed? Sales (2022) Market Share Key Differentiators
Larotrectinib TRK inhibitor Yes $780 million 65% First-in-class with broad approval
Entrectinib TRK + ROS1 inhibitor Yes $1.5 billion 25% CNS activity and indications
MEKTOVI TK inhibitor (Tovorafenib) Pending approval Potential for broader indication expansion

2.3. Pricing and Reimbursement Outlook

  • Pricing Range (US): Estimated $150,000–$200,000 per patient annually, following benchmarked costs of larotrectinib and entrectinib.
  • Reimbursement Landscape: Favorable for rare, targeted indications with active payer negotiations; benefits from orphan drug designation accelerates reimbursement pathways.

3. Market Projections and Growth Outlook

3.1. Revenue Projections (2023-2028)

Year Forecasted Revenue (USD millions) Notes
2023 $50–$100 Early access, limited uptake
2024 $150–$250 Regulatory approval, initial launch
2025 $400–$600 Broader market access, expanded indications
2026 $800–$1,200 Growing adoption, pipeline contributions
2027 $1,600–$2,200 Potential label expansions, combination therapies
2028 $2,500+ Mature market with increased indications

3.2. Key Growth Drivers

  • Regulatory approvals for NTRK fusion-positive tumors in both adult and pediatric populations.
  • Pipeline advancements, including combination strategies targeting resistance.
  • Market penetration driven by orphan drug incentives, payer support, and clinician adoption.
  • Expanding indications, notably in resistance settings and other rare tumor types.

3.3. Key Risks and Challenges

Factor Impact Mitigation Strategies
Regulatory delays Revenue slowdown Engage early with regulators, submission readiness
Competition from larotrectinib/entrectinib Market share erosion Differentiation through safety, dosing, combination use
Limited patient population Market size constraint Expand indications, explore combination strategies

4. Comparative Analysis with Competitors

Parameter MEKTOVI Larotrectinib Entrectinib
Approved Indications Pending/NTRK-fusion tumors NTRK fusion tumors NTRK, ROS1 tumors
Mechanism Tovorafenib (multi-kinase) Selective TRK inhibitor Pan-TRK, ROS1 inhibitor
Approval Status Awaiting FDA/EMA Approved Approved
Pricing (Estimated) $150k–$200k $150k–$200k $170k–$210k
Market Share (2022) Pending 65% 25%

5. Future Outlook and Opportunities

  • Pipeline Expansion: Development of next-generation inhibitors targeting resistance mutations.
  • Combination Therapies: With immunotherapies or other kinase inhibitors to extend survival and overcome resistance.
  • Biomarker Development: Refining patient selection through molecular diagnostics to maximize response rates.
  • Geographic Expansion: Targeting emerging markets with orphan drug advantages and optimized reimbursement strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical momentum: MEKTOVI’s ongoing trials and positive preliminary results bolster its potential as a pivotal therapy for NTRK fusion-positive cancers.
  • Market landscape: Dominated by larotrectinib and entrectinib; MEKTOVI’s success hinges on regulatory approval timing and differentiation.
  • Market potential: Estimated to reach $2.5 billion globally by 2028, driven predominantly by orphan indications and emerging resistance management strategies.
  • Competitive edge: Future differentiation requires pipeline innovation, combination regimens, and enhanced biomarker integration.
  • Risks: Regulatory delays, intense competition, limited patient populations necessitate strategic planning.

FAQs

Q1: When is MEKTOVI expected to receive regulatory approval?
A1: Pending FDA and EMA submissions, approval could occur in late 2023 to early 2024, contingent on trial data and agency review timelines.

Q2: How does MEKTOVI compare to existing TRK inhibitors?
A2: MEKTOVI is distinguished by its kinase profile and potential for combination strategies. Its efficacy and safety are comparable, but it currently lacks market approval and must demonstrate clear advantages.

Q3: What are the primary indications for MEKTOVI?
A3: The main target is NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors, including adult and pediatric cases, with potential expansion into resistant and rare tumor types.

Q4: What challenges could impede MEKTOVI’s market success?
A4: Challenges include competition from established TRK inhibitors, regulatory hurdles, limited patient pool (orphan status), and market penetration barriers.

Q5: What strategies can optimize MEKTOVI’s market adoption?
A5: Strategies include leveraging orphan drug benefits, expanding indications, developing combination therapies, and engaging early with clinicians and payers.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov database. (2023). "Various MEKTOVI trials."
[2] Pfizer Inc. (2022). "Investor Presentation on Tovorafenib."
[3] IQVIA Institute. (2022). "Global Oncology Market Report."
[4] EvaluatePharma. (2022). "Oncology drug sales and projections."
[5] FDA. (2022). "Regulatory guidelines for targeted kinase inhibitors."

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.