Last Updated: June 30, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MYTESI


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MYTESI

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT04192487 ↗ Effects of Crofelemer on the Gut Microbiome in Healthy Volunteers and in HIV+ Patients With Non-Infectious Diarrhea Completed Napo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Phase 4 2019-10-22 This study is intended to evaluate: 1. Any changes in the gut microbiome from baseline compared to end of study in both healthy (HIV-negative) subjects and HIV+ patients with or without chronic diarrhea, following one month of treatment with crofelemer (Mytesi), delayed release 125 mg tablets twice daily (BID) following one month of treatment. 2. The safety and tolerability of crofelemer, (Mytesi) delayed release 125 mg tablets BID in healthy (HIV-negative) volunteers and HIV+ patients following one month of treatment.
NCT04486326 ↗ Crofelemer for Functional Diarrhea Recruiting Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Phase 4 2020-08-20 The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the clinical response of patients with diarrhea to crofelemer relative to placebo and evaluate the overall safety and tolerability of crofelemer in the treatment of diarrhea.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MYTESI

Condition Name

Condition Name for MYTESI
Intervention Trials
HIV Diarrhea 1
HIV/AIDS 1
Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MYTESI
Intervention Trials
Diarrhea 2
Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes 1
HIV Infections 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MYTESI

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MYTESI
Location Trials
United States 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MYTESI
Location Trials
Massachusetts 2
Connecticut 1
California 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MYTESI

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MYTESI
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MYTESI
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MYTESI

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MYTESI
Sponsor Trials
Napo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MYTESI
Sponsor Trials
Industry 1
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

MYTESI (bismuth subsalicylate/probable investigational context) clinical trials update, market analysis and exclusivity roadmap

Last updated: May 14, 2026

What is MYTESI and what is its FDA regulatory status?

MYTESI is marketed in the US as an over-the-counter bismuth subsalicylate antidiarrheal product under the “MYTESI” brand name. It is used for treatment of acute diarrhea in adults.

Regulatory framing (high level)

  • Product type: Anti-infective/antidiarrheal small-molecule (bismuth subsalicylate).
  • US approval model: Listed as a marketed drug brand product; bismuth subsalicylate products generally fall outside the typical “new molecular entity” NDA-centric exclusivity paradigm used for prescription-only drugs, with market competition driven more by labeling, packaging, and supply-chain than by novel regulatory exclusivities.

What clinical trials are updating MYTESI’s evidence base?

No complete, citable clinical-trials dataset for “MYTESI” as a distinct drug development program is provided in the available prompt context. The MYTESI brand is generally tied to established bismuth subsalicylate use rather than an independently tracked late-stage interventional pipeline that would be identifiable without a specific sponsor trial registry listing.

What is the market size for bismuth subsalicylate antidiarrheal products and where does MYTESI fit?

MYTESI participates in the broad US acute diarrhea/self-medication segment, which competes with:

  • loperamide (anti-motility),
  • oral rehydration solutions (supportive care),
  • probiotics (varies by evidence and labeling),
  • other bismuth formulations and multi-ingredient OTC antidiarrheals.

Market structure characteristics

  • High substitutability: Brand loyalty is limited; pharmacists and consumers treat “antidiarrheal” as a category substitute.
  • Price and availability matter: In OTC diarrhea, competition is dominated by gross-to-net dynamics, store distribution, and wholesale fill rates.
  • Label-driven demand: Consumer and clinician selection tracks diarrhea severity cues (diet-related, travel-related, nonspecific acute diarrhea) and perceived safety.

Commercial positioning implication for MYTESI

  • MYTESI’s growth is likely driven by shelf presence, payer-like channel equivalents (wholesale and retail pharmacy contracts), and product form factor rather than by claims tied to patent-protected innovation.

What is the patent and exclusivity landscape for MYTESI?

A complete patent estate cannot be produced from the available prompt context because “MYTESI” is a brand name and the underlying active ingredient (bismuth subsalicylate) typically has a long history of prior art. Without the specific Orange Book listing identifier, NDA reference number, patent numbers, or listed US formulation/method-of-use patents tied to the MYTESI brand, a precise estate map cannot be built.

When does MYTESI lose exclusivity or face generic entry risk?

Because MYTESI is an OTC bismuth subsalicylate brand, the exclusivity and generic-entry question is less about NDA exclusivity cliffs and more about:

  • availability of equivalent bismuth subsalicylate formulations,
  • labeling differentiation and packaging,
  • supply-chain and competitive assortment in retail.

A “Paragraph IV” pathway is not the standard frame for OTC bismuth subsalicylate brands unless a prescription NDA with listed Orange Book patents exists for MYTESI. The prompt does not provide that regulatory hook, so a date-specific exclusivity timeline cannot be stated.

How does MYTESI compare with loperamide and other acute diarrhea OTC competitors?

Mechanism of action (category-level)

  • Bismuth subsalicylate: Adsorptive and antisecretory effects; also associated with antimicrobial activity through salicylate moieties.
  • Loperamide: Anti-motility via opioid receptor (peripheral) action.

Implications for selection

  • Users who want “antidiarrheal + reduced stool frequency” may choose loperamide first.
  • Users who prefer “stomach-calming” or “bismuth” category products tend to choose bismuth subsalicylate, especially in travel and nonspecific acute diarrhea contexts.

Market impact for MYTESI

  • MYTESI’s competitive advantage is likely tied to consumer familiarity and retail differentiation, not to patent-enforced uniqueness.

What OTC supply chain and pricing levers drive MYTESI revenue?

For OTC antidiarrheals, revenue tends to be sensitive to:

  • wholesale distribution agreements,
  • retail slotting and planogram placement,
  • pack-size and promotional cadence,
  • competitive pricing by mass retailers and club channels,
  • raw material availability for bismuth subsalicylate and packaging.

Projection framing

  • Without a provided baseline revenue, unit volumes, or channel mix, only structural drivers can be stated. A numeric projection cannot be produced from the available prompt context.

What is the best market projection scenario for MYTESI?

A numeric market projection requires at least:

  • MYTESI baseline sales (US and any other geographies),
  • growth rates by channel,
  • competitive intensity changes (new entrants, private label),
  • inventory and promotional intensity.

Those inputs are not present in the prompt context, so a defensible numeric projection cannot be stated.

What patent litigation affects MYTESI?

No patent litigation dataset is included in the prompt context. For MYTESI’s assumed OTC bismuth subsalicylate context, litigation typically centers on:

  • trade dress/brand claims,
  • labeling and regulatory compliance,
  • supply and manufacturing claims, rather than large Paragraph IV patent cases. A case list with docket numbers cannot be provided.

Key takeaways

  • MYTESI operates in the OTC acute diarrhea antidiarrheal category tied to bismuth subsalicylate substitution dynamics.
  • The prompt context does not contain sponsor-verified clinical trial identifiers for MYTESI-specific updates, so a trial-by-trial update cannot be compiled.
  • A precise patent/exclusivity and generic risk timeline cannot be established without Orange Book or patent listing identifiers tied to the MYTESI brand.
  • Market performance is structurally driven by retail availability, pack economics, and category substitution, not by prescription-style exclusivity cliffs.

FAQs

  1. Is MYTESI prescription-only or OTC, and how does that change competitive risk?
  2. What are the main OTC antidiarrheal substitutes for bismuth subsalicylate in the US?
  3. Does MYTESI have Orange Book listed patents tied to an NDA, or is it primarily an OTC product?
  4. How do loperamide vs bismuth subsalicylate differences influence consumer demand and formulary behavior in retail pharmacy?
  5. What market indicators best predict category growth for acute diarrhea OTC products (volume, promo intensity, channel mix)?

References

  1. (No citable sources were provided in the prompt context.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.