Get our Free Drug Patent Expiration Updates

Serving hundreds of leading biopharmaceutical companies globally:

Accenture
Covington
Chubb
McKinsey
Deloitte
Queensland Health
Cantor Fitzgerald
Teva
Johnson and Johnson

Generated: February 22, 2019

DrugPatentWatch Database Preview

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CYTARABINE; DAUNORUBICIN

« Back to Dashboard

Clinical Trials for Cytarabine; Daunorubicin

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Summary
NCT00002471 Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Acute B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Completed Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Phase 2 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients who have acute B-lymphoblastic leukemia or recurrent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
NCT00002499 Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Relapsed Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Unknown status Grupo Argentino de Tratamiento de la Leucemia Aguda Phase 2/Phase 3 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase II/III trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating children with relapsed acute lymphocytic leukemia.
NCT00002514 Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Standard Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Remission Completed Medical Research Council Phase 3 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known whether stem cell transplantation is more effective than standard chemotherapy in treating acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well stem cell transplantation works compared to standard combination chemotherapy in treating patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission.
NCT00002514 Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Standard Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Remission Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known whether stem cell transplantation is more effective than standard chemotherapy in treating acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well stem cell transplantation works compared to standard combination chemotherapy in treating patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission.
NCT00002514 Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Standard Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Remission Completed Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase 3 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known whether stem cell transplantation is more effective than standard chemotherapy in treating acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well stem cell transplantation works compared to standard combination chemotherapy in treating patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission.
NCT00002517 Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Completed European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC Phase 3 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which regimen of combination chemotherapy is more effective for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of different combination chemotherapy regimens in treating children who have newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.
NCT00002531 Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Adults With Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Unknown status Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital Phase 2 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Randomized phase II trial to study the effectiveness of various combination chemotherapy regimens in treating patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia.
Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Summary

This preview shows a limited data set.
Subscribe to access the full database, or try a Free Trial

Clinical Trial Conditions for Cytarabine; Daunorubicin

Condition Name

Condition Name for Cytarabine; Daunorubicin
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 80
Acute Myeloid Leukemia 42
Untreated Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia 22
Lymphoma 12
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Export unavailable in trial.
Subscribe for complete access.

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Cytarabine; Daunorubicin
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 203
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute 129
Leukemia, Myeloid 119
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma 75
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Export unavailable in trial.
Subscribe for complete access.

Clinical Trial Locations for Cytarabine; Daunorubicin

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Cytarabine; Daunorubicin
Location Trials
Canada 181
Australia 87
United Kingdom 28
Germany 26
France 23
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Export unavailable in trial.
Subscribe for complete access.

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Cytarabine; Daunorubicin
Location Trials
New York 74
California 70
Illinois 70
Ohio 64
Texas 61
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Export unavailable in trial.
Subscribe for complete access.

Clinical Trial Progress for Cytarabine; Daunorubicin

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Cytarabine; Daunorubicin
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 83
Phase 2/Phase 3 8
[disabled in preview] 122
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Export unavailable in trial.
Subscribe for complete access.

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Cytarabine; Daunorubicin
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 93
Recruiting 44
Active, not recruiting 32
[disabled in preview] 45
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Export unavailable in trial.
Subscribe for complete access.

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Cytarabine; Daunorubicin

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Cytarabine; Daunorubicin
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 96
Children's Oncology Group 29
Celator Pharmaceuticals 9
[disabled in preview] 26
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Export unavailable in trial.
Subscribe for complete access.

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Cytarabine; Daunorubicin
Sponsor Trials
Other 225
NIH 99
Industry 62
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Export unavailable in trial.
Subscribe for complete access.

For more information try a trial or see the plans and pricing

Serving hundreds of leading biopharmaceutical companies globally:

Chubb
Healthtrust
Federal Trade Commission
Boehringer Ingelheim
Fish and Richardson
McKesson
Medtronic
McKinsey
Cipla

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verifification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.