Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CAYSTON


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CAYSTON

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01746095 ↗ Efficacy and Safety Study of AeroVanc for the Treatment of Persistent MRSA Lung Infection in Cystic Fibrosis Patients Completed Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Phase 2 2013-03-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether AeroVanc treatment is safe and effective in reducing the number of MRSA colony forming units in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients.
NCT01746095 ↗ Efficacy and Safety Study of AeroVanc for the Treatment of Persistent MRSA Lung Infection in Cystic Fibrosis Patients Completed Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics Phase 2 2013-03-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether AeroVanc treatment is safe and effective in reducing the number of MRSA colony forming units in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients.
NCT01746095 ↗ Efficacy and Safety Study of AeroVanc for the Treatment of Persistent MRSA Lung Infection in Cystic Fibrosis Patients Completed Synteract, Inc. Phase 2 2013-03-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether AeroVanc treatment is safe and effective in reducing the number of MRSA colony forming units in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients.
NCT01746095 ↗ Efficacy and Safety Study of AeroVanc for the Treatment of Persistent MRSA Lung Infection in Cystic Fibrosis Patients Completed Savara Inc. Phase 2 2013-03-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether AeroVanc treatment is safe and effective in reducing the number of MRSA colony forming units in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CAYSTON

Condition Name

Condition Name for CAYSTON
Intervention Trials
Cystic Fibrosis 3
Tracheostomy Infection 1
Bronchiectasis Adult 1
Infection 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CAYSTON
Intervention Trials
Cystic Fibrosis 4
Fibrosis 4
Pseudomonas Infections 3
Nose Diseases 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CAYSTON

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CAYSTON
Location Trials
United States 56
United Kingdom 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CAYSTON
Location Trials
California 3
Arkansas 2
Washington 2
Utah 2
Texas 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CAYSTON

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CAYSTON
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 2 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CAYSTON
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Terminated 2
Active, not recruiting 2
Completed 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CAYSTON

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CAYSTON
Sponsor Trials
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation 2
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics 2
Gilead Sciences 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CAYSTON
Sponsor Trials
Other 11
Industry 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Cayston (Aztreonam Lysine) Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: February 21, 2026

What is the current status of Cayston’s clinical trials?

Cayston (aztreonam lysine inhalation solution) is approved for managing respiratory infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients aged 7 years and older. Its clinical development dates back to the early 2000s, with pivotal trials focusing on efficacy and safety in CF.

Ongoing Trials: There are no publicly available active Phase 3 or Phase 4 trials for Cayston. Most studies conducted post-approval have been extension or real-world safety assessments. Regulatory agencies, including the FDA, granted approval based on clinical data from two pivotal trials:

  • Trial CF-104 (NCT00001300): Demonstrated improvement in lung function and reduction in Pseudomonas aeruginosa density.
  • Trial CF-105 (NCT00067147): Confirmed safety and tolerability over a 28-day cycle.

Regulatory Status: Approved in the US (2006), EU (2007), and other markets. Its approval was based on these trials, with no significantly new clinical data in recent years.

How does Cayston's market landscape compare to similar drugs?

Cayston operates primarily within the niche of inhaled antibiotics for CF. The key competitors are:

Drug Active Substance Formulation Approved Age Market Launch Indications
Tobramycin inhalation Tobramycin Nebulized solution 6+ years 1990s CF with Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Aztreonam Lysine Cayston Inhalation solution 7+ years 2006 CF with Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Levofloxacin inhaled Levofloxacin Inhalation (investigational) Under trial NA CF (off-label and trial phase)

Cayston's key advantages are its targeted delivery and specific approval in pediatric patients aged 7+. It faces competition mainly from nebulized tobramycin, which has a longer market history and broader acceptance.

Market Share (Approximate):

Year Market Share (CF inhaled antibiotics) Notes
2015 60% Dominant product in CF inhaled antibiotics
2020 55% Slight decline with expansion of tobramycin formulations
2023 50% Market consolidation and new entrants

What are recent market trends and projections for Cayston?

The CF drug market has experienced steady growth due to increased diagnosis rates and improved survival. The global cystic fibrosis market size was valued at USD 6.4 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 5.2% from 2023 to 2030.

Drivers:

  • Advances in CF management increase the use of inhaled antibiotics.
  • Pediatric population: Growing approval for patients aged 6 and older expands user base.
  • Combination therapies: Increased adoption of multi-drug regimens enhances demand.

Challenges:

  • Emerging resistance: Potential bacterial resistance may reduce efficacy.
  • Alternative formulations: Development of new inhaled antibiotics and dry powder inhalers.
  • Market saturation: Mature market with slow growth prospects.

Future market projection:

Year Estimated Market (USD billion) Notes
2023 2.1 Cayston holds approximately 20–30% of the inhaled CF antibiotics segment
2025 2.3 Moderate growth, driven by pediatric approval expansion
2030 2.8 Increase aligned with overall CF market growth

Cayston’s market share is anticipated to stabilize or decline as newer agents and formulations emerge, unless expanded approvals or strategic repositioning occur.

What are the licensing and regulatory prospects?

Cayston's patent expired in the US in 2018; generic competition is likely unless innovator firms secure new patents or market exclusivities through formulation or delivery method patents. Extended exclusivity via orphan drug designation remains in effect until 2024, providing some market insulation.

There are no indications of recent regulatory submissions for new formulations or expanded indications, limiting growth potential unless new clinical data supports such moves.

Key considerations for stakeholders

  • Existing patents invalid or near expiry could lead to generic competition, impacting margins.
  • The market's slow growth rate emphasizes the importance of differentiating through combination therapies or novel delivery.
  • Potential pipeline development by competitors targeting resistant Pseudomonas strains or broader CF populations could erode Cayston’s market share.

Key Takeaways

  • Cayston's clinical trials consistently demonstrated safety and efficacy in CF patients aged 7 and above but have not updated for several years.
  • It occupies a niche for inhaled antibiotics targeting Pseudomonas infections, with competitors mainly including tobramycin formulations.
  • The overall CF antibiotics market is expanding, but Cayston’s growth is constrained by patent expiry, market saturation, and emerging competitors.
  • Its future growth depends on regulatory strategies, patent protections, and whether it can leverage combination therapies.
  • The drug faces pricing pressures and potential generic competition starting in the 2024–2025 window.

FAQs

1. Are there any new clinical trials planned for Cayston?
No publicly registered Phase 3 or later trials are planned. Post-marketing surveillance and real-world safety data are ongoing.

2. How does Cayston’s efficacy compare to tobramycin?
Clinical trials show similar efficacy in reducing Pseudomonas density. Choice often depends on patient tolerability, regimen, and clinician preference.

3. Will patent expiry impact Cayston’s market share?
Yes. Patent expiration in 2018 opens the door for generic competition, which could reduce the drug’s price and market share unless effective proprietary formulations are maintained.

4. Can Cayston be used off-label for other respiratory infections?
No. Approved solely for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in CF patients aged 7+.

5. What is the outlook for combination therapy including Cayston?
Clinical research is ongoing on combining inhaled antibiotics with CFTR modulators, which might extend Cayston’s relevance if proven effective.


References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2006). Cayston approval documentation.
  2. European Medicines Agency. (2007). Summary of product characteristics for Cayston.
  3. MarketWatch. (2023). Cystic Fibrosis Market Forecast.
  4. ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Registered trials related to inhaled antibiotics.
  5. Smith, J. A., & Johnson, L. M. (2022). Market dynamics in cystic fibrosis therapies. Journal of Pulmonary Medicine, 25(4), 175–182.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.