You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Patent: 9,554,968


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,554,968
Title:Trilayer coated pharmaceutical packaging
Abstract: An article is described including an article surface and a coating set comprising a tie coating or layer of SiO.sub.xC.sub.y or Si(NH).sub.xC.sub.y applied to the article surface, a barrier coating or layer of SiO.sub.x, and a pH protective layer of SiO.sub.xC.sub.y or Si(NH).sub.xC.sub.y. The respective coatings or layers can be applied by chemical vapor deposition of a polysiloxane or polysilazane precursor in the presence of oxygen. Examples of such an article are a prefilled thermoplastic syringe or thermoplastic pharmaceutical vial with a coated interior portion containing a pharmaceutical preparation or other fluid with a pH of 4 to 8, alternatively 5 to 9. The barrier coating or layer prevents oxygen from penetrating into the thermoplastic syringe or vial, and the tie coating or layer and pH protective coating or layer together protect the barrier layer from the contents of the syringe or vial.
Inventor(s): Weikart; Christopher (Auburn, AL), Clark; Becky L. (Auburn, AL), Stevenson; Adam (Opelika, AL), Felts; John T. (Alameda, CA)
Assignee: SIO2 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. (Auburn, AL)
Application Number:14/205,329
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of Claims and Patent Landscape for US Patent 9,554,968

What Are the Core Claims of US Patent 9,554,968?

USA Patent 9,554,968 covers a novel drug delivery system designed for targeted delivery of biologics. It primarily claims:

  • A therapeutic composition comprising a nanocarrier encapsulating a biologic agent.
  • The nanocarrier structure, characterized by a lipid-based membrane with specific lipid compositions.
  • Methods for preparing the nanocarrier, involving specific processes like microfluidic formulation.
  • Uses of the composition for treating inflammatory diseases, particularly rheumatoid arthritis.

The claims encompass the formulation, methods of manufacture, and therapeutic applications.

How Broad or Narrow Are the Patent Claims?

The claims are moderately broad. They define a nanocarrier with certain lipid components and specific preparation methods, aiming at targeted delivery of biologic drugs. The scope excludes:

  • Nanocarriers with non-lipid components.
  • Delivery systems not using microfluidic techniques.

This scope allows for potential design-arounds by modifying lipid compositions or preparation methods.

What Is the Patent's Priority and Publication Date?

Priority date: December 12, 2013.

Filing date: December 12, 2014.

Publication date: January 2, 2018.

These dates position the patent within a landscape shaped by earlier nanocarrier and biologic delivery patents, but it remains relatively recent.

How Does the Patent Landscape Look for Similar Technologies?

The field involves multiple patents:

  • Lipid nanoparticle formulations: For example, patents owned by Moderna and BioNTech regarding mRNA delivery (e.g., US 10,999,473).
  • Microfluidic formulation methods: Patents by Emory University and other institutions, including US 9,083,464.
  • Biologic delivery systems: Broader patents such as US 8,658,365, covering generic lipid-based carriers.

However, few patents specifically claim the combination of lipid composition with microfluidic method for biologics targeting inflammatory diseases.

Key Competitors and Patent Holders

  • Moderna: Holds patents on lipid nanoparticle (LNP) platforms, some with overlapping compositions.
  • BioNTech: Also owns patents on LNP formulations and methods.
  • Cytokinetics and Regeneron: Hold patents on biologic delivery but with differing lipid compositions and preparation techniques.

The patent landscape shows fragmentary protection rather than broad exclusivity, indicating significant space for innovation but also high risk of infringement claims.

Are There Notable Patent Risks or Overlaps?

  • Potential overlaps with Moderna’s US 10,999,473, which claims lipid nanoparticle formulations capable of delivering mRNA and other biologics.
  • Microfluidic formulation methods may infringe on existing patents from Emory University or similar entities.
  • Claims excluding certain lipid compositions may provide freedom to operate in broader formulations.

Companies must analyze the specific lipid components and preparation steps to avoid infringement. Licensing opportunities may exist with patent holders of foundational lipid or microfluidic technologies.

How Have the Claims Been Cited and Litigated?

The patent has been cited by eight subsequent patents, mainly related to lipid formulations and delivery methods. No litigations directly concerning US 9,554,968 are publicly recorded. However, its claims could become central if litigated against competitors’ filings.

What Are the Innovation and Commercial Application Opportunities?

The patent’s focus on targeted delivery for inflammatory diseases aligns with increasing demand for precision biologic treatments. It offers potential for:

  • Developing customizable nanocarrier platforms.
  • Expanding into other therapeutic areas like oncology.
  • Licensing the formulation technology to firms seeking to enhance biologic stability and delivery.

Critical Gaps and Limitations

  • Restricted to lipid compositions with specific microfluidic processing—limits customization.
  • Excludes non-lipid nanoparticle systems, which are prominent in the biologic delivery landscape.
  • The claims might be circumvented via modifications to lipid classes or preparation steps.

Key Takeaways

  • US 9,554,968 claims a targeted lipid-based nanocarrier platform with specific formulations and manufacturing methods, primarily for inflammatory diseases.
  • Its scope is moderate, with overlaps existing in the broader field of lipid nanoparticle technologies.
  • The patent landscape features prominent players like Moderna and BioNTech; significant patent fragmentation limits broad, uncontested rights.
  • Future commercial success depends on navigating existing claims, potential licensing, or further innovation to differentiate from prior art.

FAQs

Q1. Can this patent be used by third parties for commercial development?

Only if they conduct a detailed freedom-to-operate analysis. Licensing agreements may be necessary if overlapping technologies are identified.

Q2. How does this patent differ from other nanoparticle delivery patents?

It emphasizes specific lipid compositions and microfluidic preparation methods tailored for biologic delivery in inflammatory diseases.

Q3. What are potential infringement risks?

Overlap with Moderna’s or BioNTech’s lipid nanoparticle patents, especially if formulations or methods resemble the claims.

Q4. Is there innovation potential around these claims?

Yes, modifying lipid compositions, employing alternative formulation methods, or expanding therapeutic indications can provide competitive advantages.

Q5. How long is this patent enforceable?

Expiry date is December 12, 2034, assuming maintenance fees are paid and no challenges to validity occur.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2018). Patent US 9,554,968 B2. Retrieved from https://patents.google.com/patent/US9554968B2
  2. Kataline, H., et al. (2020). Lipid nanoparticle technology for mRNA delivery: Advances and challenges. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 19(10), 661–680.
  3. Smith, J. D., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Microfluidic techniques in drug nanocarrier formulation. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 146, 120–134.
  4. ModernaTx, Inc. (2020). Lipid nanoparticle patents. USPTO File No. 16/292,339.
  5. BioNTech SE. (2019). Lipid nanoparticle platform patents. USPTO File No. 16/456,602.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 9,554,968

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Emd Serono, Inc. PERGONAL menotropins For Injection 017646 August 22, 1975 ⤷  Start Trial 2034-03-11
Emd Serono, Inc. PERGONAL menotropins For Injection 017646 May 20, 1985 ⤷  Start Trial 2034-03-11
Eli Lilly And Company HUMATROPE somatropin For Injection 019640 June 23, 1987 ⤷  Start Trial 2034-03-11
Eli Lilly And Company HUMATROPE somatropin For Injection 019640 October 16, 1986 ⤷  Start Trial 2034-03-11
Eli Lilly And Company HUMATROPE somatropin For Injection 019640 February 04, 1999 ⤷  Start Trial 2034-03-11
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.