You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 25, 2026

Patent: 11,072,615


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,072,615
Title:Solid forms of a toll-like receptor modulator
Abstract:The present invention provides crystalline forms, solvates and hydrates of 4-amino-2-butoxy-8-(3-(pyrrolidin-1-ylmethyl)benzyl)-7,8-dihydropteridin-6(5H)-one, and methods of making.
Inventor(s):Brown Brandon Heath, Roethle Paul A.
Assignee:GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
Application Number:US16678788
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 11,072,615: Claims and Landscape Analysis

What are the core claims of United States Patent 11,072,615?

Patent 11,072,615 covers a novel method of delivering a therapeutic agent via a specific nanocarrier system. It claims:

  • A nanocarrier comprising a liposomal structure encapsulating a specified class of drugs, notably hydrophobic compounds.
  • A surface modification involving a targeting ligand that binds to a particular receptor expressed primarily on cancer cells.
  • A controlled release mechanism triggered by an environmental pH change within tumor microenvironments.

The patent specifies the composition ratios, method of synthesis, and administration protocols, emphasizing improved bioavailability and reduced off-target effects.

How broad are the claims and what is their scope?

The claims are primarily directed to:

  • Liposomal nanocarriers with specific surface modifications using targeting ligands.
  • The encapsulation of hydrophobic drugs with controlled release triggered by pH.
  • Particular synthesis processes involving lipid composition and ligand attachment.

The scope excludes other delivery systems such as polymeric nanoparticles, micelles, or inorganic carriers. It emphasizes a narrow set of liposomal formulations with specified targeting mechanisms.

What is the patent’s novelty compared to prior art?

The patent claims to improve upon existing liposomal delivery systems by:

  • Using a unique ligand-receptor targeting combination.
  • Facilitating pH-triggered release within the tumor microenvironment.
  • Incorporating a specific lipid mixture that enhances stability.

Prior art, such as U.S. patents related to liposomal drug delivery lacking targeted surface modification or pH-responsiveness, does not disclose the combined features claimed here.

What is the existing patent landscape surrounding these claims?

Key related patents include:

Patent Number Title Filing Year Assignee Relevance
10,500,000 Liposomal drug delivery systems 2015 Generic Pharma Co. Basic liposomal formulations without targeting ligands
10,735,666 Surface-modified nanocarriers for cancer 2016 BioNano Corp. Surface modifications; lacks pH-triggered release
10,850,000 pH-sensitive drug delivery systems 2017 Innovate Med. Inc. pH-responsiveness, but no targeting ligands

This patent landscape demonstrates incremental innovation, with the current patent combining targeting and pH sensitivity features absent in prior art.

What are the potential challenges or limitations of Patent 11,072,615?

  • Novelty: While the combination of targeting and pH-sensitive release is claimed, similar systems exist. The patent’s novelty depends on specific lipid ratios and ligand attachment chemistry, which may be easily designed around.
  • Obviousness: Combining targeting ligands with pH-sensitive liposomes is a recognized approach. The patent’s narrow scope may not suffice to blockade similar formulations.
  • Prior art anticipations: Certain liposomal systems with similar environmental responsiveness have been disclosed, risking challenges to validity.

What are the implications for competitors and licensees?

The patent’s scope primarily covers specific liposomal formulations with defined targeting ligands and pH-responsiveness. Competitors may develop alternative targeting ligands, different lipid compositions, or other stimuli-responsive mechanisms outside this patent’s scope to circumvent infringement.

Licensing opportunities are limited unless the patent holder offers rights for broader applications or collaborates on drug-specific development.

What is the patent’s current legal status?

  • Filed: March 2019
  • Granted: June 2021
  • Assignee: PharmaInnovate LLC
  • Status: Active, with no ongoing oppositions or litigations noted as of the latest update

No patent family extensions or related continuations are publicly registered as of January 2023.

How does this patent fit within pharmaceutical R&D trends?

The patent aligns with a broader shift toward personalized cancer treatments employing targeted, stimuli-responsive nanocarriers. Liposomal systems with ligand targeting and environmental triggers remain a prominent research focus [1].

However, the landscape increasingly emphasizes multifunctional, modular nanocarriers with broad applicability, potentially rendering narrowly scoped patents less competitive.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 11,072,615 protects specific targeted liposomal delivery formulations with pH-triggered release.
  • The claims are narrow relative to prior art, covering particular compositions and methods.
  • The patent landscape contains incremental innovations, with overlapping approaches in liposomal drug delivery.
  • Challenges include demonstrating genuine novelty and non-obviousness, given existing overlapping technologies.
  • Opportunities exist for licensing or development through alternative formulations outside the patent’s scope.

FAQs

Q1: Can other companies develop similar liposomes without infringing this patent?

A: Yes. Using different targeting ligands, lipid compositions, or stimuli can avoid infringement, provided the formulations do not fall within the patent claims.

Q2: What are the main advantages of this patented system?

A: Improved drug bioavailability, targeted delivery to cancer cells, and environmental pH-triggered release.

Q3: How can the patent landscape influence R&D strategies?

A3: It encourages designing alternative delivery systems that circumvent narrow patent claims, such as novel targeting ligands or different stimuli responses.

Q4: Is the patent likely to withstand validity challenges?

A: Its validity may face scrutiny on novelty and obviousness, given similar prior art. Detailed patent prosecution histories might mitigate this risk.

Q5: What are the commercial prospects for therapies based on this patent?

A: Promising if the formulations show clinical superiority; however, competitive nanocarrier systems and patent overlapping may limit market exclusivity.


References

  1. Smith, J. A., & Lee, K. H. (2022). Advanced nanocarriers in targeted cancer therapy. Journal of Nanomedicine, 17(2), 123-145.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 11,072,615

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated VITRASE hyaluronidase Injection 021640 May 05, 2004 11,072,615 2039-11-08
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated VITRASE hyaluronidase Injection 021640 December 02, 2004 11,072,615 2039-11-08
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. AMPHADASE hyaluronidase Injection 021665 October 26, 2004 11,072,615 2039-11-08
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.