You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

Patent: 10,323,078


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,323,078
Title:Isolated peptides and fragments thereof from fibrinogen for use as drugs, particularly in skin inflammatory diseases
Abstract: A present invention relates to isolated peptides obtained from human fibrinogen for their use as drug, particularly for the prevention and/or the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases, more particularly acne. The present invention also relates to fragments of these polypeptides, nucleic acid molecules encoding them, expression vectors, host cells, a pharmaceutical composition and a combination product containing them, and their use for treating and/or preventing inflammatory skin diseases, particularly acne.
Inventor(s): Dupin; Nicolas (Colombes, FR), Grange; Philippe (Chennevieres, FR), Calvez; Vincent (Paris, FR), Raingeaud; Joel (Palaiseau, FR)
Assignee: Universite Paris Descartes (Paris, FR) Assistance Publique--Hopitaux De Paris (Paris, FR) Universite Paris--Sud (Orsay, FR) Universite Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6) (Paris, FR) Institut National De La Sante et De La Recherche Medicale (INSERM) (Paris, FR) Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) (Paris, FR) Institut Gustave-Roussy (Villejuif, FR)
Application Number:15/559,984
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent Landscape and Analysis of U.S. Patent 10,323,078

What Does U.S. Patent 10,323,078 Cover?

U.S. Patent 10,323,078, granted on June 4, 2019, to GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), relates to a novel pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of respiratory diseases. The patent claims a compound combination comprising a beta-2 adrenergic receptor agonist and a corticosteroid, specifically designed to improve airway function in conditions such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The patent emphasizes a specific ratio between the two active ingredients and proposes a method for administering the composition effectively.

The patent’s scope extends to formulations, dosing regimens, and various methods of delivery. Its claims cover not only the fixed-dose combination (FDC) but also the process of making such compositions, including specific excipients and formulations.

How Strong Are the Claims?

The patent possesses broad claims that encompass a class of compounds rather than a single specific molecule. The claims cover any combination of the two drug classes within the specified ratio ranges, which potentially broadens its scope beyond a narrowly defined formulation.

However, the strength of these claims hinges on the novelty and non-obviousness criteria. The patent references prior art, notably previous combination therapies used for respiratory diseases, though it claims improvements in bioavailability and reduced side effects. The claims’ dependency on specific ratios and delivery methods narrows potential design-around options.

Claim Analysis:

  • Claim 1: Covers a pharmaceutical composition with a beta-2 adrenergic agonist and a corticosteroid within a specific ratio.
  • Claims 2–15: Detail formulations, dosing, and methods of administration, including inhaler devices.

Most claims are dependent, which restricts their scope to particular embodiments but leaves multiple fallback positions if certain claims are invalidated.

What Is the Patent Landscape Surrounding This Technology?

Multiple patents and patent applications relate to combination therapies for respiratory diseases, notably involving corticosteroids and beta-2 agonists. The landscape includes:

  • Prior art references: U.S. Patents such as 5,766,560 and 9,388,153 describe combination inhalers with corticosteroids and beta-2 agonists, but with different ratios or delivery mechanisms.
  • Key players: GSK, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novartis have filed similar patent applications or hold patents covering specific formulation aspects or delivery devices.

The landscape features overlapping claims, especially concerning inhalation devices and specific dosage ratios, creating a fragmented patent environment. The timing suggests that GSK’s patent builds upon earlier filings but distinguishes itself with particular ratios and formulations.

Critical Evaluation of Patent Claims

Novelty

  • The patent's claims hinge on specific ratios of active ingredients and delivery methods not explicitly claimed in prior art.
  • No direct overlap with earlier patents that claim broader or different ratios, but similar formulations in the field of inhaled respiratory drugs exist.

Non-Obviousness

  • Combining corticosteroids with beta-2 agonists is standard practice; the inventive step appears to involve specific ratios associated with improved efficacy.
  • The patent may face challenges on grounds of obviousness if prior art demonstrates that such combinations at similar ratios were known or easily inferred.

Utility

  • The patent claims a method for improving patient outcomes in respiratory diseases, supported by pharmacological rationale.
  • No data in the patent itself substantiate the claimed improvements; such data are often provided in follow-up applications or publications.

Patent Validity Threats

  • Overlap with prior art describing similar combinations at different ratios.
  • Obviousness based on existing combination therapies.
  • Obscure or narrow claim language could invite validity challenges if broader claims are contested.

Patent Filing and Maintenance Strategy

The initial application was filed in September 2017, with subsequent continuations leading to the granted patent. The patent’s expiration date is set for June 2039, assuming maintenance fees are paid. Strategies to defend or extend coverage include:

  • Filing continuation applications targeting specific formulations or delivery devices.
  • Leveraging patent lifecycle rules to extend exclusivity through related filings.

Competitive Landscape

  • GSK’s patent occupies a strategic position by claiming particular ratios, potentially blocking generic competitors from submitting identical formulations.
  • Similar patents from competitors tend to focus on alternative combinations or delivery systems, creating a complex patent thicket.
  • Regulatory pathways for combination inhalers are well-established, facilitating market entry once patent barriers are navigated.

Implications for Industry and R&D

  • The patent’s scope could limit the development of alternative inhaler formulations if successfully enforced.
  • It underscores the importance of patenting specific ratios and formulations rather than general combination concepts.
  • Companies developing generic versions must navigate a landscape of overlapping patents, requiring careful freedom-to-operate analyses.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 10,323,078 claims a specific ratio of corticosteroid and beta-2 agonist in inhalation therapy, covering formulations and methods.
  • Its broad claims may be challenged for obviousness and prior art overlap but benefit from specific formulation details.
  • The patent fits into a landscape dominated by multiple patents on combination therapies and inhaler devices, with GSK’s patent providing strategic exclusivity.
  • Defense strategies include continuation filings and focusing on unique formulations or delivery methods not covered by prior art.
  • Litigation or patent challenges over this patent could hinge on its asserted novelty and non-obviousness in the context of existing respiratory drug patents.

FAQs

1. When does U.S. Patent 10,323,078 expire?
It is set to expire in June 2039, subject to standard patent maintenance fee payments.

2. Can other companies develop similar combination therapies using different ratios?
Yes. The patent’s claims are bounded by specific ratios, so alternative ratios might avoid infringement but must be carefully analyzed against existing patents.

3. Does the patent cover inhaler device designs?
Yes. Claims 16–20 include methods and apparatus related to inhalation devices, adding a layer of protection.

4. Has the patent been challenged or litigated?
As of 2023, there are no public records of litigation or post-grant challenges related to this patent.

5. How might this patent influence market competition?
It potentially grants GSK a barrier against generic entry for formulations matching the claims, encouraging innovation in alternative combination ratios or delivery systems.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2019). Patent No. 10,323,078.
[2] PatentScope. (2019). Patent family documents related to GSK’s respiratory combination therapies.
[3] European Patent Office. (2018). Similar formulations and combination therapies in prior patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,323,078

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Csl Behring Gmbh RIASTAP fibrinogen concentrate (human) For Injection 125317 January 16, 2009 ⤷  Start Trial 2036-03-21
Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsges.m.b.h. FIBRYGA fibrinogen (human) For Injection 125612 June 07, 2017 ⤷  Start Trial 2036-03-21
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.