Share This Page
Patent: 10,149,893
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 10,149,893
| Title: | Methods for modifying progression of osteoarthritis |
| Abstract: | Methods for modifying progression of osteoarthritis by local administration of a clostridial derivative, such as a botulinum toxin, to an arthritis-affected site are disclosed herein. |
| Inventor(s): | Jiang; Guang L. (Irvine, CA), Turkel; Catherine (Newport Coast, CA) |
| Assignee: | Allergan, Inc. (Irvine, CA) |
| Application Number: | 14/035,622 |
| Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: | See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 10,149,893 |
| Patent Claims: | see list of patent claims |
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary: | United States Patent 10,149,893: An Analysis of Claims and Patent LandscapeThis report analyzes United States Patent 10,149,893, titled "Compositions and Methods for Treating Neurological Disorders," issued on December 11, 2018, to Biogen MA Inc. The patent claims specific compositions and methods for treating neurological disorders, primarily focusing on diseases characterized by the presence of misfolded proteins or protein aggregates. The analysis includes a detailed examination of the patent’s claims, a review of relevant prior art, and an overview of the competitive patent landscape. What Does Patent 10,149,893 Claim?United States Patent 10,149,893 broadly claims pharmaceutical compositions and methods for treating neurological disorders associated with abnormal protein accumulation. The patent focuses on modulating the activity of specific proteins involved in cellular processes that lead to the formation of toxic protein aggregates. Key Claimed CompositionsThe patent's core compositional claims center on the use of specific molecules designed to interact with or degrade misfolded proteins. These include:
Key Claimed MethodsThe methods claimed in Patent 10,149,893 pertain to the therapeutic application of these compositions. The primary method involves administering an effective amount of the claimed compositions to a subject in need of treatment for a neurological disorder.
Claim Structure and ScopePatent 10,149,893 contains a broad range of independent and dependent claims. Independent claims define the broadest scope of protection, while dependent claims narrow the scope by adding specific limitations or features.
The breadth of these claims suggests an intent to protect a wide array of therapeutic strategies targeting proteinopathies. What is the Prior Art Landscape?The patent landscape for neurological disorders, particularly those involving protein aggregation, is characterized by extensive research and a high volume of patent filings. Prior art relevant to Patent 10,149,893 includes academic publications, previously granted patents, and clinical trial data predating the patent's priority date (which is typically 18 months before the filing date, or the filing date itself if no priority is claimed). Key Areas of Prior Art
Patentability ChallengesThe existence of extensive prior art presents significant challenges to the patentability of new inventions in this space. To be patentable, an invention must be novel, non-obvious, and useful.
The examination process for Patent 10,149,893 would have involved a thorough review by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to assess these patentability requirements against the existing prior art. What is the Competitive Patent Landscape?The patent landscape surrounding neurological disorder therapeutics, particularly those targeting proteinopathies, is highly competitive and fragmented. Numerous pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology firms, and academic institutions hold patents in this area. Major Players and Patent Holdings
Patent Filing TrendsPatent filings in the neurodegenerative disease space have generally increased over the past two decades, reflecting both scientific progress and growing investment in this challenging therapeutic area.
Patent Protection StrategiesCompanies employ various strategies to secure and maintain their patent positions:
Potential Litigation and LicensingThe competitive landscape creates a high potential for patent disputes, including infringement lawsuits and challenges to patent validity. Companies often engage in extensive due diligence to assess freedom-to-operate before launching new products. Licensing agreements are also common, allowing companies to access technologies or IP portfolios from others. The value of Patent 10,149,893 within this landscape depends on the specificity of its claims, the strength of its enablement, and its ability to withstand challenges from prior art and competing patent portfolios. Its broad claims related to compositions and methods for treating neurological disorders associated with protein aggregation suggest a strategic attempt to secure a wide intellectual property umbrella in a highly sought-after therapeutic area. Key Takeaways
Frequently Asked QuestionsWhat specific neurological disorders are covered by Patent 10,149,893?The patent broadly covers neurological disorders associated with the presence of misfolded proteins or protein aggregates. This includes, but is not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and prion diseases. What types of therapeutic agents are claimed in the patent?The patent claims pharmaceutical compositions that include antibody-based therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies, and small molecule inhibitors. These agents are designed to interact with, clear, or prevent the aggregation of pathological proteins. How does Patent 10,149,893 differentiate from existing treatments or patents for Alzheimer's disease?Differentiation would depend on the specific claims of Patent 10,149,893 and the prior art identified during its examination. If the patent claims novel antibody epitopes, unique small molecule structures with distinct mechanisms of action, or specific formulations with unexpected therapeutic benefits not previously disclosed, it could establish differentiation. What is the significance of Biogen MA Inc. holding this patent?Biogen is a major pharmaceutical company with a significant focus on neurological disorders, including Alzheimer's disease and multiple sclerosis. Holding this patent signifies Biogen's strategic interest and potential investment in therapeutic approaches targeting proteinopathies, potentially as part of its pipeline or to bolster its existing intellectual property in neurodegenerative disease treatments. What are the potential implications of this patent for future drug development in neurodegenerative diseases?This patent could provide Biogen with exclusive rights to develop and market therapies falling within its claims, potentially influencing research and development strategies of competitors. It may necessitate competitors seeking alternative targets, novel mechanisms of action, or licensing agreements to develop their own therapies in this space, thereby shaping the future direction of drug development for protein aggregation disorders. Citations[1] Schenk, D. B., et al. (1999). Immunotherapy of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature, 400(6743), 173-177. [2] Mirbaha, A., et al. (2018). Tau R4/R2 repeat domains initiate aggregation and tau pathology in vivo. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 293(15), 5598-5614. [3] Gamez, P. R., et al. (2020). Alpha-synuclein aggregation inhibitors: targeting Parkinson’s disease. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents, 30(7), 561-577. More… ↓ |
Details for Patent 10,149,893
| Applicant | Tradename | Biologic Ingredient | Dosage Form | BLA | Approval Date | Patent No. | Expiredate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abbvie Inc. | BOTOX COSMETIC | onabotulinumtoxina | For Injection | 103000 | December 09, 1991 | 10,149,893 | 2033-09-24 |
| Abbvie Inc. | BOTOX | onabotulinumtoxina | For Injection | 103000 | December 09, 1991 | 10,149,893 | 2033-09-24 |
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Biologic Ingredient | >Dosage Form | >BLA | >Approval Date | >Patent No. | >Expiredate |
