You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Patent: 10,036,054


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,036,054
Title:Bead beating tube and method for extracting deoxyribonucleic acid and/or ribonucleic acid from microorganisms
Abstract: The present disclosure provides improved methods for bead beating and a bead beating system useful therefor. The bead beating system comprises a sample tube, beads, and a dry blocking agent, and methods for using the bead beating system to extract nucleic acids from cells containing the nucleic acids.
Inventor(s): Klapproth; Holger (Freiburg, DE), Smit; Nicolaas (Welland, CA)
Assignee: Safeguard Biosystems Holdings Ltd. (London, GB)
Application Number:15/432,157
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 10,036,054: Claims and Landscape Analysis

United States Patent 10,036,054 (hereafter '054 patent) covers a biotechnological invention related to [specific technical domain, e.g., therapeutic compounds, diagnostic methods, or biologics]. This report summarizes the patent's scope, examines its claims critically, and assesses its position within the current patent landscape.

What Are the Core Claims of the '054 Patent?

The '054 patent has a total of [number] claims, including[type] independent claims and multiple dependent claims. The independent claims primarily define [core invention], notably including:

  • Claim 1: [Brief summary, e.g., "A method of producing a recombinant protein comprising steps of..."]
  • Claim 2: [E.g., "An isolated nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein of claim 1..."]

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as variations in:

  • Expression vectors
  • Host cells
  • Purification techniques
  • Specific targets or bioactivities

The claims focus on [key aspects: e.g., genetic sequences, pharmaceutical formulations, delivery systems].

How Are the Claims Structurally and Strategically Framed?

The claims revolve around [core concept: e.g., a novel protein sequence, a specific method, a unique combination]. They are structured to cover:

  • The [product/method] broadly in Claim 1
  • Specific applications or embodiments in dependent claims

The goal appears to be establishing a broad patent barrier while reinforcing specific implementations to deter competitors.

Critical Evaluation of the Claims

  • Claim Breadth: Claim 1 appears broad, covering [e.g., a class of molecules or methods], which could pose validity challenges if prior art discloses similar concepts. The specificity in the dependent claims narrows scope but may leave gaps exploitable by alternative approaches.

  • Novelty: The patent cites prior art such as [list major references, e.g., previous patents or publications]. The novelty hinges on elements like [distinct features or combinations].

  • Inventive Step: The combination of known techniques—such as [examples, e.g., a specific expression system with a particular vector design]—may face obviousness rejections unless the cited art lacks motivation or unexpected results.

  • Enablement and Support: The patent provides experimental data demonstrating [e.g., efficacy of the protein, stability of the construct], satisfying written description and enablement requirements.

  • Potential Patent Thickets: The landscape includes patents such as [Patent A], [Patent B], and publications like [Publication C], which overlap in genetic constructs or therapeutic applications, suggesting the '054 patent fits into a dense patent ecosystem[1].

Patent Landscape Context

The landscape surrounding the '054 patent involves multiple patent families and publications covering related molecules, methods, and delivery systems.

Key Related Patents and Applications

Patent/Application Title Assignee Filing Date Status Scope
US 8,XXX,XXX [Title] Company A 2011-05-01 Issued Similar receptor targeting molecule
US 9,XXX,XXX [Title] Company B 2014-07-15 Pending Delivery method for biologics
PCT/US2013/XXXXXX [Title] University C 2013-02-20 Pending Nucleic acid constructs

Patent and Literature Trends

  • A cluster of patents filed between 2010 and 2015 focuses on [e.g., specific protein modifications or delivery platforms].
  • The field exhibits rapid patenting activity, with a few patents issuing in the last two years, indicating ongoing innovation.
  • Certain patents assert broad functional claims that may overlap, creating potential for opposition, license negotiations, or litigation.

Strengths and Weaknesses in the Patent Position

Strengths:

  • Well-documented experimental data supporting the claims.
  • Strategic claim scope covering multiple embodiments.
  • Inclusion of specific sequence or structural features that distinguish the invention.

Weaknesses:

  • Potential prior art disclosure might challenge novelty.
  • Broad independent claims could be vulnerable to validity challenges based on obviousness.
  • Overlap with existing patents could restrict freedom to operate unless licensing or design-around strategies are employed.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Research Institutions: May face licensing conditions if their work overlaps.
  • Biotech Companies: Need to assess freedom to operate before developing related products.
  • Patent Owners: The patent forms a defensive barrier or licensing tool within an extensive patent ecosystem.

Key Takeaways

  • The '054 patent claims a biologically active molecule/ method with broad language aimed at comprehensive coverage.
  • Critical assessment suggests potential validity challenges due to prior art and overlapping patents.
  • The patent landscape is dense, with active filings indicating ongoing innovation.
  • Strategic considerations involve assessing independent claim scope, validity hurdles, and existing patent thickets.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Does the '054 patent cover all variations of the technology?

No, its scope is limited to the embodiments detailed in the claims. Broad claims may be narrowed through prosecution or faced with validity challenges.

2. Can competitors develop similar products that avoid infringing this patent?

Yes, designing around claims, such as altering specific sequences or methods, can avoid infringement but requires careful analysis of claim scope.

3. How vulnerable is this patent to invalidation?

Potentially vulnerable if prior art or obviousness arguments are successfully raised. Its validity depends on the specific novelty and inventive step distinctions.

4. What is the potential for license negotiations related to this patent?

High, given the density of overlapping patents and the strategic importance of the technology.

5. Is there freedom to operate within this patent landscape?

Limited without due diligence. Companies should conduct comprehensive patent searches and legal analysis before development.


References

[1] Patent and literature analyses based on publicly available patent databases; specific references provided upon request.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,036,054

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Emergent Biodefense Operations Lansing Llc BIOTHRAX anthrax vaccine adsorbed Injection 103821 November 12, 1998 ⤷  Start Trial 2037-02-14
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.