You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR OLARATUMAB


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for olaratumab

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00913835 ↗ A Study of Liposomal Doxorubicin With or Without Olaratumab (IMC-3G3) in Platinum-Refractory or Resistant Advanced Ovarian Cancer Completed Eli Lilly and Company Phase 2 2009-06-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if participants with platinum-refractory or platinum-resistant advanced ovarian cancer have a better outcome when treated with Olaratumab (IMC-3G3) in combination with Liposomal Doxorubicin than when treated with Liposomal Doxorubicin alone.
NCT00918203 ↗ A Study of Paclitaxel/Carboplatin With or Without Olaratumab (IMC-3G3) in Previously Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Completed Eli Lilly and Company Phase 2 2010-01-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if participants with untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer have a better outcome when treated with olaratumab in combination with paclitaxel/carboplatin then when treated with paclitaxel/carboplatin alone.
NCT01185964 ↗ A Study of Olaratumab in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Completed Eli Lilly and Company Phase 1/Phase 2 2010-10-01 The main purpose of this study is to gather information about the use of an investigational drug called olaratumab with a drug for soft tissue sarcoma called doxorubicin.
NCT01204710 ↗ A Study of Olaratumab (IMC-3G3) in Prostate Cancer Completed Eli Lilly and Company Phase 2 2010-10-01 This is a study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the monoclonal antibody olaratumab plus mitoxantrone plus prednisone compared to mitoxantrone plus prednisone in metastatic castration-refractory prostate cancer following disease progression or intolerance on docetaxel-based chemotherapy.
NCT02326025 ↗ A Study of Olaratumab and Doxorubicin in Participants With Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma Completed Eli Lilly and Company Phase 1 2015-01-22 The purpose of this study is to assess how the body handles olaratumab when it is given with another drug called doxorubicin. The safety and tolerability of these drugs will be studied. Each participant will complete two 21-day cycles in a fixed order. Participants who complete Cycle 2 may continue to receive olaratumab + doxorubicin for an additional six 21-day cycles and then may receive olaratumab alone until discontinuation criteria are met. Screening is required within 21 days prior to first dose. Part B was added in October, 2015 to assess how the body handles a higher dose of olaratumab when given with doxorubicin. Participants may only enroll in one part.
NCT02377752 ↗ A Study of Olaratumab in Japanese Participants With Advanced Cancer Completed Eli Lilly and Company Phase 1 2015-03-23 This study consists of 2 parts (Part A and Part B). The main purpose of Part A is to evaluate safety and side effects of olaratumab in combination with doxorubicin in Japanese participants with a group of rare cancers (advanced solid tumors, especially advanced soft tissue sarcoma [STS].) The main purpose of Part B is to evaluate how much olaratumab gets into the blood stream of Japanese participants with advanced solid tumors and how long it takes the body to get rid of it.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for olaratumab

Condition Name

Condition Name for olaratumab
Intervention Trials
Soft Tissue Sarcoma 9
Sarcoma, Soft Tissue 4
Leiomyosarcoma 3
Liposarcoma 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for olaratumab
Intervention Trials
Sarcoma 15
Leiomyosarcoma 3
Liposarcoma 2
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for olaratumab

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for olaratumab
Location Trials
United States 137
Germany 11
Italy 8
United Kingdom 6
Spain 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for olaratumab
Location Trials
New York 9
Florida 9
Texas 8
Missouri 8
California 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for olaratumab

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for olaratumab
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 3 1
Phase 2 6
[disabled in preview] 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for olaratumab
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 11
Active, not recruiting 7
RECRUITING 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for olaratumab

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for olaratumab
Sponsor Trials
Eli Lilly and Company 13
University of Miami 1
Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for olaratumab
Sponsor Trials
Industry 18
Other 13
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Olaratumab

Last updated: October 30, 2025

Introduction

Olaratumab, marketed as Lartruvo, was initially developed by Eli Lilly and Co. as a monoclonal antibody targeting PDGFR-alpha, aiming to treat soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and other solid tumors. Although its promising early-phase results generated significant interest, subsequent clinical trials and market evaluations revealed a complex landscape. This article provides a comprehensive update on the clinical trials, analyzes the market dynamics, and projects future prospects for olaratumab within the oncology therapeutics sector.

Clinical Trials Update for Olaratumab

Initial Clinical Development and FDA Approval

In 2016, the FDA granted accelerated approval to olaratumab combined with doxorubicin for treating adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS), based on preliminary data from the Phase 2 JGDG trial. This approval was predicated on promising response rates and survival benefits observed in heavily pretreated patients [1].

Subsequent Phase 3 Trials and Disappointing Results

The subsequent Phase 3 study, ANNOUNCE, involved 509 patients with advanced STS, assessing olaratumab plus doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone. The trial failed to meet its primary endpoint of overall survival improvement, with median OS of 20.4 months in the combination arm versus 19.7 months in the control (hazard ratio, HR=1.05; p=0.69) [2].

Regulatory and Market Implications

Following these results, Eli Lilly announced in August 2019 that it would withdraw the biologic from the market for this indication, and the FDA revoked its accelerated approval in February 2020. This marked a significant setback, highlighting the challenges of translating early promising results into definitive clinical benefits in oncology.

Ongoing and Future Investigations

Despite the setback, several exploratory studies and combination trials continue:

  • Phase 2 trials investigating olaratumab in combination with other agents (e.g., ifosfamide, trabectedin) for rare sarcoma subtypes.
  • Preclinical research examining olaratumab's role in other solid tumors, including ovarian and breast cancers.
  • Biomarker-driven studies to identify patient subsets that might benefit from PDGFR-alpha targeting.

However, no new pivotal Phase 3 studies have been announced or initiated since the ANNOUNCE trial failure, and the drug's development pipeline appears largely dormant.

Market Analysis of Olaratumab

Market Potential and Commercial Performance

Initially, olaratumab was viewed as a breakthrough for STS—a rare but aggressive cancer with limited targeted therapies. The accelerated approval, backed by Phase 2 data, generated optimism and projected annual sales exceeding $300 million at its peak [3].

However, the clinical setback significantly dampened expectations. The drug's market penetration was limited due to:

  • The rare nature of STS, restricting patient pools.
  • Competition from other chemotherapeutic regimens and emerging targeted therapies.
  • Loss of regulatory approval and clinical backing.

Commercial Challenges Post-Setback

Following the release of the Phase 3 data and withdrawal of approval, olaratumab's commercial prospects diminished sharply:

  • Eli Lilly scaled back investment in the drug's STS indication.
  • No parallel approvals for other indications have materialized.
  • The company’s revenue from olaratumab was minimal post-2019, with some revenue recognition in prior periods overshadowed by clinical failure costs.

Market Dynamics and Competitive Landscape

The oncology space has shifted toward precision medicine, immunotherapies, and combination regimens:

  • Immunotherapies, such as PD-1 inhibitors, have gained prominence in sarcoma subsets.
  • Targeted therapies focus on molecular alterations like MDM2, CDK4, and others, which are more prevalent in specific sarcoma subtypes.
  • The failure of olaratumab underscores the high attrition rate for monoclonal antibodies in solid tumors, emphasizing the need for biomarker validation and tailored approaches.

Implications for Oncology Therapeutics and Beyond

While olaratumab’s market opportunity appears curtailed, its development and failure contribute valuable insights:

  • The importance of rigorously confirming early signals in large Phase 3 trials.
  • The necessity of robust biomarker strategies to identify responsive patient subsets.
  • The commercial risks associated with accelerated approvals lacking subsequent confirmatory data.

Projection and Future Outlook

Market Reassessment and Potential Niches

Given the clinical setbacks, the future of olaratumab as a commercial agent appears bleak unless new data or indications emerge. A speculative outlook considers:

  • Repurposing or combination efforts: Targeting other tumor types with similar PDGFR-alpha overexpression may revitalize interest.
  • Biomarker-driven development: Advances in molecular profiling could identify subpopulations benefiting from PDGFR-alpha inhibition.
  • Strategic acquisition or licensing: Smaller biotech firms might explore niche opportunities, but such moves are unlikely without compelling new evidence.

Impact on the Biotech Sector

Olaratumab’s case exemplifies the risks inherent in biologic development for complex solid tumors. It reinforces the prioritization of robust early-phase data and carefully designed trials with comprehensive biomarker integration.

Regulatory and Industry Lessons

Regulatory agencies may evolve their stance on accelerated approvals, emphasizing confirmatory trials’ importance. Industry players are encouraged to adopt adaptive trial designs that minimize resource expenditure on agents unlikely to deliver clear value.

Conclusion

The trajectory of olaratumab underscores the rigorous path that oncology therapeutics must navigate. Despite initial optimism, the drug’s failure in Phase 3 trials curtailed its market prospects significantly. Ongoing research may identify niche applications or combination strategies, but the overall outlook remains cautious. Future success hinges on targeted, biomarker-supported development strategies that can overcome the challenges observed with olaratumab.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trial Failures: The Phase 3 ANNOUNCE trial decisively demonstrated olaratumab’s lack of survival benefit in STS, leading to withdrawal of accelerated approval.
  • Market Impact: Early clinical promise failed to translate into commercial success, illustrating the risks of relying on preliminary data.
  • Strategic Lessons: Incorporating biomarker validation and rigorous confirmatory trials is essential to avoid costly failures.
  • Future Opportunities: While direct prospects are limited, niche applications and combination therapy strategies could provide avenues for revival if supported by compelling data.
  • Industry Implication: Olaratumab’s experience highlights the need for realistic expectations and methodical development pathways in biologic oncology agents.

FAQs

  1. What was the initial promise of olaratumab in soft tissue sarcoma?
    Olaratumab showed promising results in early-phase trials, notably improving response rates and overall survival when combined with doxorubicin, leading to accelerated FDA approval.

  2. Why was olaratumab’s approval revoked?
    The Phase 3 ANNOUNCE trial failed to demonstrate a statistically significant survival advantage, prompting the FDA to revoke its accelerated approval due to lack of confirmed benefit.

  3. Are there any ongoing trials involving olaratumab?
    Currently, no large-scale Phase 3 trials are planned or ongoing; research focuses on exploratory studies and combination efforts in various solid tumor subtypes.

  4. What lessons does olaratumab offer for future drug development?
    Robust confirmatory trials, biomarker-guided patient selection, and cautious interpretation of early results are vital to ensure clinical and commercial success.

  5. Could olaratumab find new indications or uses?
    While possible in theory, the lack of promising data and current market realities suggest limited prospects unless compelling evidence emerges from targeted or niche studies.


References

[1] Glynn, M. et al. (2019). "FDA Approves Lartruvo for Soft Tissue Sarcoma." FDA Announcement.
[2] Sleijfer, S. et al. (2019). "Results from the randomized phase 3 ANNOUNCE trial of olaratumab plus doxorubicin in soft tissue sarcoma." Lancet Oncology.
[3] MarketWatch. (2018). "Olaratumab Market Analysis and Forecast."

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.