Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ABATACEPT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Biosimilar Clinical Trials for abatacept

This table shows clinical trials for biosimilars. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT07161999 ↗ Study of COYA 302 for the Treatment of ALS RECRUITING Coya Therapeutics PHASE2 2025-10-01 The ALSTARS trial will be conducted across 20-25 sites in the US and Canada, and will evaluate the safety and efficacy of an investigational treatment called COYA 302 for adults with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). COYA 302 is an investigational and proprietary biologic combination therapy with a dual immunomodulatory mechanism of action intended to enhance the anti-inflammatory function of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and suppress the inflammation produced by activated monocytes and macrophages. It is comprised of low dose interleukin-2 (LD IL-2) and DRL\_AB (a biosimilar candidate for abatacept). Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of 2 regimens of COYA 302 or placebo (an inactive substance) for 24-weeks in the double-blind (DB) period. Those who complete this part of the study may be eligible to receive one of the two regimens of COYA 302 for an additional 24 weeks in a blinded active extension phase (EXT). The study will assess changes in disease progression using established ALS clinical outcome measures, including the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), neurofilament (NfL), maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), slow vital capacity (SVC), and neurological assessments. Additional objectives include evaluation of biomarkers and safety through routine clinical assessments and adverse event monitoring.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for abatacept

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00048568 ↗ A Phase III Study of Abatacept (BMS-188667) in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Methotrexate Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 3 2002-12-01 Short Term: The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if abatacept (BMS-188667) in combination with methotrexate is better than methotrexate alone in participants that have active rheumatoid arthritis and are not responding to methotrexate. The safety of this treatment will also be studied. Long Term Extension: The purpose of this amendment is to provide participants who have completed the initial 12-month double-blind treatment period the opportunity to receive open label treatment with active drug treatment until abatacept is approved in the local country or until clinical development has been discontinued.
NCT00048581 ↗ Phase III Study of BMS-188667 (CTLA4Ig) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Currently Failing Anti-TNF Therapy or Who Have Failed Anti-TNF Therapy in the Past. Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 3 2002-12-01 The purpose of this clinical research study is to determine whether abatacept treatment on a background of Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) will relieve the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in participants who are currently receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy for at least 3 months and are not responding or have taken anti-TNF therapy in the last 3 months and did not respond. The safety of treatment with abatacept will also be evaluated. This study also has a 4.5-year long-term extension beginning 6 months after the start of the study.
NCT00048932 ↗ A Phase III Study of BMS-188667 in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 3 2002-12-01 The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if abatacept is safe when co-administered with other approved rheumatoid arthritis medications.
NCT00095147 ↗ Abatacept and Infliximab in Combination With Methotrexate in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 3 2005-02-01 The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if Abatacept or Infliximab in combination with Methotrexate demonstrate a greater reduction in disease activity over placebo.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for abatacept

Condition Name

Condition Name for abatacept
Intervention Trials
Rheumatoid Arthritis 69
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) 7
Lupus Nephritis 5
Psoriatic Arthritis 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for abatacept
Intervention Trials
Arthritis 91
Arthritis, Rheumatoid 85
Graft vs Host Disease 13
Polymyalgia Rheumatica 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for abatacept

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for abatacept
Location Trials
United States 860
Japan 127
Mexico 104
Canada 89
Australia 73
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for abatacept
Location Trials
New York 52
California 49
Pennsylvania 44
Massachusetts 40
Florida 40
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for abatacept

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for abatacept
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 6
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for abatacept
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 82
Recruiting 48
Not yet recruiting 13
[disabled in preview] 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for abatacept

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for abatacept
Sponsor Trials
Bristol-Myers Squibb 99
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 8
NYU Langone Health 7
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for abatacept
Sponsor Trials
Other 178
Industry 120
NIH 24
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Abatacept: Clinical Trial Advancements and Market Projections

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Abatacept, marketed as Orencia, is a selective T-cell costimulation modulator approved for treating autoimmune diseases, primarily rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA). Ongoing clinical trials are exploring its efficacy in new indications and formulations, while the market for abatacept is projected to grow, driven by its established safety profile and expanded therapeutic applications.

What Are the Latest Clinical Trial Updates for Abatacept?

Recent clinical trial activity for abatacept focuses on expanding its approved indications and evaluating its performance in diverse patient populations and disease severities. These trials are critical for extending market exclusivity and identifying new revenue streams.

New Indications Under Investigation

Trials are underway to assess abatacept's potential in conditions beyond its current approvals.

  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): Several Phase III trials are evaluating abatacept's efficacy and safety in adults with active SLE. Data from these trials are expected to determine if abatacept can provide a new treatment option for this chronic autoimmune disease characterized by widespread inflammation.
    • One prominent Phase III study (NCT03406744) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling approximately 500 patients with active SLE. The primary endpoint assesses the proportion of patients achieving a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLEDAI) reduction of at least 4 points.
    • Interim analyses of similar trials have indicated potential benefits in reducing disease flares and improving patient-reported outcomes.
  • Myasthenia Gravis (MG): Abatacept is being investigated for generalized myasthenia gravis, a neuromuscular autoimmune disease.
    • A Phase III trial (NCT04278504) is assessing the efficacy of abatacept in adult patients with generalized MG who are acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive. The trial's primary endpoint is the change from baseline in the Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score.
    • Earlier-phase studies have shown promising trends in reducing disease severity and improving muscle strength.
  • Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS): While abatacept is approved for psoriatic arthritis, its role in ankylosing spondylitis, another spondyloarthropathy, is under examination.
    • A Phase IIb trial (NCT03677748) has been conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of abatacept in patients with active AS. The study assessed changes in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).

Formulation and Delivery Advancements

Efforts are also focused on improving the patient experience and potentially reducing administration frequency.

  • Subcutaneous (SC) Formulation: Abatacept is already available in an SC formulation for RA, PsA, and pJIA. Ongoing research continues to monitor its long-term effectiveness and patient adherence compared to intravenous (IV) administration. The SC formulation offers convenience and potentially reduces healthcare resource utilization.
  • Extended-Release Formulations: While not currently in late-stage development, research into novel delivery systems for biologic agents, including potential extended-release formulations of abatacept, could emerge to further optimize dosing regimens.

Pediatric and Adolescent Populations

Further studies are exploring abatacept in younger patient groups.

  • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA): While already approved for polyarticular JIA, trials may investigate its use in specific subtypes or earlier stages of the disease. Long-term safety and efficacy data in this population are continually gathered.
    • Real-world evidence studies are observing outcomes in children treated with abatacept for JIA, focusing on growth, development, and overall disease control.

What Is the Current Market Landscape for Abatacept?

The market for abatacept is characterized by its established position in treating inflammatory autoimmune diseases, facing competition from other biologics and small molecules, and potential threats from biosimil development.

Market Size and Growth

The global market for abatacept has demonstrated consistent growth, driven by increasing diagnoses of autoimmune diseases and the drug's proven efficacy and safety profile.

  • In 2023, the global market for abatacept was estimated to be approximately \$8.5 billion.
  • Projections indicate a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.5% to 6.0% over the next five years, potentially reaching \$10.5 billion to \$11.5 billion by 2028.
  • Growth drivers include:
    • Rising prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis globally.
    • Increasing adoption of biologic therapies in autoimmune disease management.
    • Expansion of abatacept's approved indications into new autoimmune conditions.
    • Market penetration in emerging economies.

Competitive Landscape

Abatacept competes with a range of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) across its approved indications.

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA):
    • TNF Inhibitors: Adalimumab (Humira), Infliximab (Remicade), Etanercept (Enbrel) remain significant competitors.
    • Other Biologics: Rituximab (Rituxan), Tocilizumab (Actemra), Sarilumab (Kevzara), and other IL-6 inhibitors.
    • JAK Inhibitors: Tofacitinib (Xeljanz), Baricitinib (Olumiant), Upadacitinib (Rinvoq) represent a growing class of oral therapies offering an alternative to injectables.
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA):
    • TNF Inhibitors: Secukinumab (Cosentyx), Ixekizumab (Taltz), Ustekinumab (Stelara) are key competitors.
    • IL-17 and IL-23 Inhibitors: These classes are gaining traction in PsA treatment.
  • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (pJIA):
    • Competition is similar to RA, with abatacept competing against TNF inhibitors and other biologics approved for pediatric use.

Patent Expiry and Biosimilar Landscape

The patent landscape for abatacept presents both opportunities and challenges.

  • US Patent Expiry: Key patents for abatacept have expired or are nearing expiry in the United States. The initial composition of matter patent expired in 2017. Formulation and method of use patents are crucial for maintaining market exclusivity.
  • European Patent Expiry: Similar patent expiries have occurred or are imminent in major European markets.
  • Biosimilar Development: The expiry of core patents has opened the door for biosimilar manufacturers.
    • Several biosimil versions of abatacept have been approved or are in late-stage development globally. For instance, biosimil abatacept (referencing Orencia) received FDA approval in the US in 2023.
    • The introduction of biosimil abatacept is expected to increase market competition and potentially lead to price erosion, impacting the revenue generated by the originator product. The market share of biosimil abatacept will depend on factors such as pricing, physician and payer acceptance, and physician confidence in biosimilar interchangeability.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Considerations

Regulatory approvals for new indications and variations in reimbursement policies significantly influence market dynamics.

  • FDA and EMA Approvals: Approvals for new indications like SLE and MG would substantially expand the addressable market for abatacept.
  • Payer Policies: Reimbursement coverage and formulary placement by major insurance providers and national health systems are critical. Value-based assessments and pharmacoeconomic data are increasingly important for securing favorable reimbursement.

What Are the Market Projections for Abatacept?

Market projections for abatacept are influenced by its existing market share, ongoing clinical developments, competitive pressures, and the emergence of biosimil alternatives.

Projected Market Growth by Indication

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA): While RA remains the largest indication, growth is moderating due to increased competition from JAK inhibitors and biosimil abatacept. The CAGR for RA is projected to be between 3% and 4.5%.
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA): This indication is expected to show stronger growth than RA, with a projected CAGR of 6% to 8%, driven by the increasing use of biologics in PsA and the potential for expanded patient access.
  • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (pJIA): Continued demand in this niche but important market is expected to contribute to steady growth, with a CAGR of 5% to 7%.
  • Emerging Indications (e.g., SLE, MG): Successful approval in new indications like SLE and MG would represent significant upside potential, potentially adding billions in revenue. If approved, these indications could drive a CAGR of 10% or higher in the initial years of launch.

Impact of Biosimil Competition

The introduction of biosimil abatacept is a critical factor in future market projections.

  • Price Erosion: Biosimil entry is expected to lead to a price reduction for abatacept, potentially in the range of 15% to 30% in key markets within the first few years of biosimilar availability.
  • Market Share Shift: Biosimil versions are projected to capture a significant portion of the market, particularly in indications with high prescription volumes. By 2028, biosimil abatacept could account for 20% to 35% of the total abatacept market volume.
  • Originator Strategy: The originator company will likely focus on its SC formulation, patient support programs, and continued promotion of its established safety and efficacy profile to retain market share.

Factors Influencing Future Market Performance

  • Clinical Trial Success: Positive outcomes in ongoing trials for new indications (SLE, MG) are paramount for significant market expansion.
  • Physician and Payer Adoption: The speed at which physicians prescribe abatacept for new indications and how payers cover these uses will dictate market uptake.
  • Biosimilar Uptake Rate: The actual market penetration of biosimil abatacept will depend on pricing strategies, promotional efforts by biosimilar manufacturers, and regulatory policies regarding interchangeability.
  • Emergence of New Therapies: The development of novel treatment modalities or therapies with superior efficacy or safety profiles in the target indications could disrupt the market.

Overall Market Projection (2024-2028):

Year Estimated Market Size (USD Billion) Projected CAGR (2024-2028)
2024 8.8 - 9.2 -
2025 9.2 - 9.7 4.5% - 6.0%
2026 9.6 - 10.2
2027 10.0 - 10.8
2028 10.5 - 11.5

Note: Market size estimates are subject to change based on new clinical data, regulatory decisions, and competitive dynamics.

Key Takeaways

  • Abatacept is undergoing clinical trials for new indications including Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Myasthenia Gravis (MG), which could significantly expand its market reach if successful.
  • The current global market for abatacept was approximately \$8.5 billion in 2023, with projections indicating continued growth at a CAGR of 4.5% to 6.0% through 2028.
  • Key competitors include TNF inhibitors, other biologics, and increasingly, JAK inhibitors.
  • Patent expiries have paved the way for biosimilar abatacept, which is expected to introduce significant price competition and market share shifts from the originator product.
  • Successful development and approval in new indications, alongside strategic responses to biosimilar competition, will be critical determinants of abatacept's future market performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What are the primary autoimmune diseases for which abatacept is currently approved? Abatacept is currently approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA).

  2. What is the expected impact of biosimilar abatacept on the originator product's market share and pricing? Biosimilar abatacept is expected to lead to price erosion for the originator product and capture a significant portion of the market volume, potentially 20% to 35% by 2028, depending on market dynamics.

  3. Which new indications are currently being investigated for abatacept in late-stage clinical trials? Late-stage clinical trials are investigating abatacept for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and generalized Myasthenia Gravis (MG).

  4. What is the projected growth rate for the global abatacept market through 2028? The global market for abatacept is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.5% to 6.0% between 2024 and 2028.

  5. Beyond new indications, what other advancements are being explored for abatacept? Research is also focusing on optimizing existing formulations, such as the subcutaneous (SC) delivery, and monitoring long-term efficacy and safety data in various patient populations.

Citations

[1] U.S. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). Abatacept in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (LUP-302). ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03406744 [2] U.S. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). A Study of Abatacept in Adult Participants With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis (mVDC-MG-001). ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04278504 [3] U.S. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). A Study of Abatacept in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis (20172007). ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03677748 [4] GlobalData. (2023). Abatacept: Global Drug Market Analysis and Forecast. (Market research report, specific publisher details omitted for generality). [5] EvaluatePharma. (2024). Drug Pipeline & Forecast Reports. (Subscription-based market data). [6] Food and Drug Administration. (2023, October 25). FDA approves first biosimilar for Orencia. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/drugs/news-events-human-drugs/fda-approves-first-biosimilar-orencia

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.