Last Updated: June 9, 2026

CAVERJECT IMPULSE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Caverject Impulse patents expire, and when can generic versions of Caverject Impulse launch?

Caverject Impulse is a drug marketed by Pfizer and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in CAVERJECT IMPULSE is alprostadil. There are seven drug master file entries for this compound. Three suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the alprostadil profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Caverject Impulse

A generic version of CAVERJECT IMPULSE was approved as alprostadil by HIKMA on January 20th, 1998.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for CAVERJECT IMPULSE?
  • What are the global sales for CAVERJECT IMPULSE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for CAVERJECT IMPULSE?
Summary for CAVERJECT IMPULSE
Pharmacology for CAVERJECT IMPULSE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for CAVERJECT IMPULSE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Pfizer CAVERJECT IMPULSE alprostadil INJECTABLE;INJECTION 021212-001 Jun 11, 2002 RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Pfizer CAVERJECT IMPULSE alprostadil INJECTABLE;INJECTION 021212-002 Jun 11, 2002 RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for CAVERJECT IMPULSE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Pfizer CAVERJECT IMPULSE alprostadil INJECTABLE;INJECTION 021212-001 Jun 11, 2002 4,968,299 ⤷  Start Trial
Pfizer CAVERJECT IMPULSE alprostadil INJECTABLE;INJECTION 021212-002 Jun 11, 2002 5,716,338 ⤷  Start Trial
Pfizer CAVERJECT IMPULSE alprostadil INJECTABLE;INJECTION 021212-001 Jun 11, 2002 5,716,338 ⤷  Start Trial
Pfizer CAVERJECT IMPULSE alprostadil INJECTABLE;INJECTION 021212-001 Jun 11, 2002 5,501,673 ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

CAVERJECT IMPULSE: Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: April 26, 2026

CAVERJECT IMPULSE (alprostadil for intracavernosal injection) is a mature erectile dysfunction (ED) product with a concentrated, specialty-physician market, pricing pressure from generics and branded competitors, and a contracting growth profile driven by penetration of alternative PDE5 inhibitors and regional reimbursement dynamics. Financial trajectory is shaped by patent and exclusivity status in key markets, inventory and channel-stocking cycles for specialty injectables, and periodic conversion to lower-cost products.

What market forces shape CAVERJECT IMPULSE demand?

ED treatment mix is the primary demand constraint

The ED market is dominated by oral PDE5 inhibitors (e.g., sildenafil, tadalafil), with intracavernosal therapies typically used when oral therapies fail, are contraindicated, or for specific patient preference and clinician practice patterns. This places CAVERJECT IMPULSE in a secondary line-of-therapy segment that does not scale like oral drugs.

Specialty administration limits addressable share

CAVERJECT IMPULSE is administered by intracavernosal injection, which shifts adoption toward:

  • Urologist-led initiation and follow-up
  • Patient training programs and nurse-led initiation in some settings
  • Higher switching friction than oral pills

This reduces the speed of new penetration and limits switching into the product unless there is a clear advantage versus other injection therapies.

Competitive pressure concentrates on alternatives

In intracavernosal ED treatment, CAVERJECT IMPULSE competes with other intracavernosal options and with combination approaches used in clinical practice. Competitive pressure shows up as:

  • Formulary placement changes by payer type (commercial, Medicare Advantage, Medicaid)
  • Step therapy protocols that delay access after failure of oral PDE5 inhibitors
  • Substitution among injection products when acquisition costs fall

Pricing and contracting drive revenue volatility

For mature specialty injectables, revenue often tracks:

  • Wholesale acquisition cost and rebate dynamics
  • Contracting with group purchasing organizations and specialty pharmacy channels
  • Timing of conversion from higher-priced branded supply to lower-cost alternatives

In this structure, unit demand can be relatively stable while revenue moves with price realization and channel mix.


What is the competitive and channel structure?

Manufacturer-to-channel pipeline characteristics

CAVERJECT IMPULSE is marketed through specialty pharmacy and urology distribution channels where:

  • Forecast errors lead to short-term inventory swings
  • Payer contracting can alter which product is carried in a local formulary
  • Conversion to alternative products can be rapid once a lower-cost option gains preferred status

Substitution dynamics

Substitution is most likely when:

  • Patients move after inadequate response or tolerability issues
  • A payer classifies an alternative injection therapy as preferred
  • A generic or lower-cost branded supply displaces the incumbent in institutional formularies

How do patent and exclusivity dynamics affect the financial path?

Generic and branded erosion risk

CAVERJECT IMPULSE is a branded presentation of alprostadil. Alprostadil-based intracavernosal therapies have faced competitive entry and market erosion typical of mature molecules. Financial implications usually manifest through:

  • Reduced price premiums
  • Loss of preferred formulary placement
  • Higher promotional pressure to hold share
  • Channel mix shift toward lower-cost SKUs

Timeline mechanics

Market erosion tends to proceed in phases:

  1. Pre-entry: stable demand as prescribers maintain established routines.
  2. Entry: increased rebate pressure and formulary change risk.
  3. Post-entry: share stabilization at lower price points or further contraction if substitution accelerates.

For CAVERJECT IMPULSE, the long-run trajectory is constrained by its position as a branded injectable in a segment increasingly optimized for cost and ease of access.


What does the financial trajectory typically look like for this product class?

Expected revenue curve shape

For mature intracavernosal ED products, the common financial pattern is:

  • Modest unit stability or slow decline
  • Gradual revenue contraction driven by price realization
  • Periodic spikes around contracting cycles and channel adjustments
  • Profit pressure from distribution and rebate burdens

Key drivers of quarterly volatility

The biggest sources of quarter-to-quarter movement are usually not prescriptions alone. They are:

  • Inventory builds or draws in specialty pharmacy channels
  • Temporary contracting changes or administrative delays
  • Batch-level availability and procurement timing
  • Rebate true-ups tied to payer contract terms

What are the most material product-level factors impacting sales?

Clinical positioning and patient adherence

CAVERJECT IMPULSE’s adoption depends on:

  • Prescriber comfort with dosing and titration
  • Patient adherence to injection protocols
  • Patient response and adverse-event tolerability (e.g., penile pain risk influences persistence)

These factors determine whether the product retains a durable base once a patient is initiated.

Formulation and device format

CAVERJECT IMPULSE uses a specific delivery format and device workflow, which can matter in real-world uptake. If comparable products offer easier handling, better patient experience, or preferential coverage, share can shift.

Reimbursement and coverage

In ED, reimbursement is payer-driven and varies by:

  • Step therapy requirements
  • Prior authorization rules for injection therapies
  • Coverage limitations by plan type and formulary tier

How should investors and R&D leaders interpret the trajectory?

Revenue outlook

For a mature intracavernosal ED product, the revenue thesis typically hinges on:

  • Defensive share in urology practices
  • Sustained coverage in high-volume payer segments
  • Maintenance of pricing power via contracting and patient stickiness

Absent major formulation differentiation or broad new label expansion, the direction of travel is usually constrained by:

  • Oral PDE5 inhibitor dominance
  • Ongoing substitution among injection options
  • Pricing pressure from lower-cost competitors

Margin outlook

Margin is influenced by:

  • Net price after rebates and chargebacks
  • Manufacturing and distribution costs for injectables
  • Sales force and field support intensity for urology education
  • Specialty pharmacy support costs

Market dynamics summary table

Dimension Core dynamic Likely impact on CAVERJECT IMPULSE
ED category structure Oral PDE5 inhibitors lead; injection is a second-line option Limits unit growth ceiling
Access pattern Urologist-led initiation, training, and follow-up Slower switching and slower expansion
Payer behavior Formulary tiering, step therapy, and prior authorization Price realization risk and access volatility
Competitive field Intracavernosal alternatives and substitution based on net cost Branded share pressure over time
Channel mechanics Specialty pharmacy contracting, inventory cycles Revenue volatility independent of prescription volume
Molecule maturity Branded mature injectable faces erosion risk Long-run contraction likely unless differentiators persist

Key Takeaways

  • CAVERJECT IMPULSE is a mature branded alprostadil injection in a second-line ED segment where growth is structurally capped by oral PDE5 inhibitor dominance.
  • Demand is stabilized by urology practice workflows and patient stickiness once initiated, but revenue is vulnerable to payer contracting, rebates, and substitution to preferred injection options.
  • The most meaningful financial movements are typically driven by net price and channel contracting mechanics rather than rapid unit growth.
  • The long-run trajectory should be assessed as revenue defense under price pressure, not as a high-growth profile.

FAQs

1) What segment of the ED market does CAVERJECT IMPULSE sit in?

It sits in intracavernosal ED therapy used after oral PDE5 inhibitors fail, are contraindicated, or when injection therapy is clinically preferred.

2) Why does growth usually lag in injection ED products?

Intracavernosal administration is clinician- and training-intensive, which slows patient acquisition and reduces payer-wide scaling relative to oral therapies.

3) What most often drives revenue volatility for specialty injectables?

Net price effects from rebates and contracting plus specialty pharmacy inventory and channel mix changes.

4) How do formulary decisions affect financial outcomes?

Preferred formulary placement can protect net pricing and volume, while step therapy or tier downgrades can shift patients to lower-cost alternatives.

5) What is the practical investment interpretation of a mature branded injectable?

Expect defensive dynamics: stable or slowly declining units offset partially by pricing strategy, with margin and revenue driven by rebate and contracting outcomes.


References

[1] US Food and Drug Administration. “CAVERJECT IMPULSE (alprostadil) prescribing information.” FDA accessdata.
[2] U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Company annual reports and 10-K filings (Alprostadil product marketing company disclosures where applicable).
[3] IQVIA and industry ED market analyses (public summaries and payer/formulary trend reporting where available).
[4] Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare Part D coverage and utilization policy documentation (ED medication coverage and formulary tiering context).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.