Last Updated: June 9, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for generic pharmaceutical drug: levalbuterol hydrochloride


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


levalbuterol hydrochloride

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Luoxin Aurovitas LEVALBUTEROL HYDROCHLORIDE levalbuterol hydrochloride SOLUTION;INHALATION 207628 ANDA Aurobindo Pharma Limited 65862-942-03 30 POUCH in 1 CARTON (65862-942-03) / 1 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSE in 1 POUCH (65862-942-50) / .5 mL in 1 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSE 2017-01-31
Luoxin Aurovitas LEVALBUTEROL HYDROCHLORIDE levalbuterol hydrochloride SOLUTION;INHALATION 207625 ANDA Aurobindo Pharma Limited 65862-943-25 5 POUCH in 1 CARTON (65862-943-25) / 5 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSE in 1 POUCH (65862-943-05) / 3 mL in 1 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSE 2016-12-30
Luoxin Aurovitas LEVALBUTEROL HYDROCHLORIDE levalbuterol hydrochloride SOLUTION;INHALATION 207625 ANDA Aurobindo Pharma Limited 65862-944-25 5 POUCH in 1 CARTON (65862-944-25) / 5 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSE in 1 POUCH (65862-944-05) / 3 mL in 1 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSE 2016-12-30
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Levalbuterol Hydrochloride Suppliers: API, Formulation, and Contract Manufacturing Landscape

Last updated: May 24, 2026

Executive summary: Key supply chain options for levalbuterol hydrochloride split into (1) API manufacture (levalbuterol base and/or levalbuterol hydrochloride) and (2) finished-dose production for inhalation products (notably metered-dose inhalers, nebulizer solutions, and unit-dose concentrates). Because levalbuterol is a mature, widely manufactured beta-2 agonist active, supplier coverage is broad across China, India, and Western contract manufacturing networks, with finished-dose production concentrated among companies that maintain inhalation device know-how and regulatory history.

Which companies supply levalbuterol hydrochloride API?

Short answer: The levalbuterol hydrochloride API market is supplied by multiple manufacturers in China and India, with additional coverage from specialty API sites serving inhalation and respiratory portfolios.

API supplier segments

  1. API manufacturers (direct levalbuterol hydrochloride): Produce levalbuterol salt for downstream formulation.
  2. API intermediates and contract synthesis: Supply levalbuterol base or close intermediates that are converted to the hydrochloride salt under supplier or customer control.
  3. Regulatory-grade API distributors: Stock API and coordinate documentation, audits, and logistics to finished-dose manufacturers.

What to verify in supplier selection (API)

  • CEP/DMF status for the specific API form used in the target jurisdiction.
  • Particle size and polymorph controls where specified by the finished product dossier.
  • Residual solvents, assay, impurity profile aligned to the target monograph and the finished dose specification.
  • Sterility-adjacent controls are not usually required for API, but hold times, bioburden, and packaging integrity matter when the API is used in inhalation formulations.

What finished-dose manufacturers supply levalbuterol hydrochloride inhalation products?

Short answer: Finished-dose supply is dominated by inhalation specialists and established respiratory generics brands operating through US market access, EU national launches, or distributor-backed distribution models.

Common levalbuterol product types that drive supplier needs

  • Nebulizer solutions (including unit-dose formats)
  • Metered-dose inhalers (MDIs), where compatibility with propellant and actuator design is critical
  • Concentrates for compounding or pharmacy use in some markets (varies by region)

Manufacturing and quality constraints for finished doses

  • Device and formulation integration for MDIs (compatibility testing, valve/canister sealing, dose uniformity).
  • For nebulizer solutions: container-closure integrity, extractables/leachables controls, and viscosity and droplet-size performance where specified.
  • Validation packages for inhaled products: filling accuracy, aerosol performance studies, and stability protocols.

How do global levalbuterol hydrochloride suppliers compare (China vs India vs EU/US)?

Short answer: China and India typically offer the widest price and capacity breadth for API and some intermediates, while EU/US networks often lead in finished-dose execution and regulatory submission support. Contract manufacturing capability in inhalation often sits with companies that have device-formulation integration experience.

Typical sourcing patterns

  • US/EU finished-dose brands often dual-source API to reduce lead-time risk and maintain audit leverage.
  • Generics and specialty pharma frequently source from Asian API houses and rely on local or contract finished-dose manufacturers for formulation and filing.

Cost and lead-time considerations

  • API lead time can be short for standard salts but longer for specific impurity profiles and dossier-matched lots.
  • Finished-dose lead time depends on device procurement, filling line scheduling, and stability-batch commitments.

Which suppliers support levalbuterol hydrochloride for US FDA filings?

Short answer: US filings rely on suppliers that can provide DMF/ASMF documentation and batch traceability, plus customers capable of meeting CMC and inhalation-specific requirements.

US-ready supplier capabilities

  • DMF/ASMF alignment: documentation that can be referenced for the finished-dose submission.
  • Quality agreements: audit rights, deviation reporting, and change control.
  • Comparability support: post-change impurity and process control bridging where supplier changes are made.

Supplier documentation that impacts approval timelines

  • CoA consistency across lots.
  • Stability protocol adherence and retest dates.
  • Impurity qualification status and method validation reporting (as required in dossiers).

What patent and exclusivity context affects sourcing decisions for levalbuterol hydrochloride?

Short answer: Levalbuterol is not generally a single-product monoculture; sourcing decisions are driven by the specific branded or generic product under development and the patent set protecting that formulation, device, or method of use.

Practical impact on supplier choice

  • Brands seeking to protect a particular formulation or delivery approach typically require tightly controlled API and excipient sourcing.
  • Generic developers focus on supplier documentation quality to support bioequivalence and CMC defensibility.

What generic entry risks exist for levalbuterol hydrochloride based on supplier and CMC dependencies?

Short answer: Generic entry risks cluster around CMC execution rather than API availability. The main failure modes are inhalation performance gaps (especially MDIs) and dossier deficiencies from documentation or impurity specification mismatches.

Failure modes that delay or complicate launch

  • Inconsistent impurity profile between supplier lots.
  • Container closure variability for nebulizer solutions.
  • Device compatibility failures for MDI actuator and valve performance.
  • Stability batch failures due to formulation sensitivity.

Which levalbuterol hydrochloride formulations drive the biggest supplier barriers?

Short answer: MDIs tend to have higher supplier barriers because of device integration. Nebulizer solutions also require strict controls, but the device integration complexity is lower.

MDI vs nebulizer sourcing complexity

  • MDIs: can require co-development and tight fit between formulation, canister, valve, and actuator.
  • Nebulizers: require formulation robustness with acceptable droplet performance and stability in the specific container system.

How should companies qualify levalbuterol hydrochloride suppliers for regulatory and litigation defensibility?

Short answer: Qualification should be audit-led, dossier-driven, and change-control heavy, with explicit traceability to the specific API used in pivotal or pivotal-equivalent CMC batches.

Qualification checklist

  • Pre-audit of GMP status and inhalation product experience.
  • Capability to meet the target specification for impurities and salt form.
  • Controlled packaging and stability commitments.
  • Robust change control and notification SLAs for process, site, or raw material substitutions.
  • Batch traceability to retain “as-submitted” comparability defensibility.

Key Takeaways

  • Levalbuterol hydrochloride supply splits into API and finished-dose inhalation manufacturing, with broad global coverage for API and more specialized capability for inhalation delivery systems.
  • The highest sourcing barriers typically attach to MDI device-formulation integration and documentation alignment for FDA-ready CMC packages.
  • Supplier selection is less constrained by availability and more constrained by impurity control, dossier match, stability performance, and device compatibility.
  • A regulatory defensible supply chain relies on strong DMF/ASMF documentation, traceable CMC batches, and strict change control.

FAQs

  1. What documentation should an API supplier provide for levalbuterol hydrochloride for FDA submissions?
  2. Are there differences in supplier readiness for levalbuterol hydrochloride MDI vs nebulizer solution manufacturing?
  3. How do impurity profiles affect interchangeability of levalbuterol hydrochloride API lots?
  4. What container-closure and extractables testing is required for levalbuterol hydrochloride nebulizer solutions?
  5. How do change-control and stability commitments influence qualification of levalbuterol hydrochloride suppliers?

References

  1. FDA. Inhalation drug products. FDA guidance and resources (accessed via FDA website).
  2. EMA. Guideline on quality of inhalation and nasal products. EMA website (accessed via EMA website).
  3. FDA. DMF/ASMF overview and submission references (accessed via FDA website).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing