Last Updated: June 9, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for LIPITOR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


LIPITOR

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Upjohn LIPITOR atorvastatin calcium TABLET;ORAL 020702 NDA Viatris Specialty LLC 58151-155-77 90 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (58151-155-77) 2024-05-01
Upjohn LIPITOR atorvastatin calcium TABLET;ORAL 020702 NDA Viatris Specialty LLC 58151-156-77 90 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (58151-156-77) 2024-02-20
Upjohn LIPITOR atorvastatin calcium TABLET;ORAL 020702 NDA Viatris Specialty LLC 58151-157-77 90 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (58151-157-77) 2024-01-03
Upjohn LIPITOR atorvastatin calcium TABLET;ORAL 020702 NDA Viatris Specialty LLC 58151-158-77 90 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (58151-158-77) 2024-02-29
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers and packagers for LIPITOR

Last updated: May 30, 2026

Lipitor (atorvastatin) Suppliers: APIs, Key Excipients, and Manufacturing Partners by Supply-Chain Node

Lipitor is sold in the US by Pfizer, but the supply chain for atorvastatin tablets spans (1) active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) manufacturers, (2) excipient and tablet-compression supply, and (3) finished-dose contract manufacturers for specific strengths and packages. A complete, audit-ready supplier map requires current, product-specific data from Pfizer’s commercial dossiers, FDA drug-label/CGMP supply-chain disclosures, and bid documents tied to the NDCs. Without that NDC-level linkage, supplier identification cannot be completed accurately.

Who supplies the atorvastatin API used to make Lipitor?

Featured snippet answer: Atorvastatin API is manufactured by specialized small-molecule API producers under CGMP, then supplied to finished-dose manufacturers and packagers. For Lipitor, Pfizer typically uses a qualified supplier network for both API and intermediates, but Lipitor’s exact API source can differ by batch, strength, and market.

What are the API supply-chain nodes for atorvastatin tablets

  • Atorvastatin synthesis intermediates (multiple chemical steps before API crystallization)
  • Final API manufacture with defined polymorph/spec specifications
  • API packaging and labeling for cGMP traceability
  • Release testing (identity, assay, impurity profile, moisture, particle size where applicable)

Which supplier categories matter most for risk

  • API and intermediate suppliers with tight impurity control (key for statins due to process-dependent impurity burdens)
  • Manufacturers with validated routes to ensure consistent impurity profiles across scale changes
  • Suppliers with stable polymorph control and batch-to-batch consistency

Which excipients and formulation-material suppliers support Lipitor tablets?

Featured snippet answer: Lipitor tablet supply depends on excipient suppliers for coating systems, tablet binders/disintegrants, and film-coating pigments. Excipients are typically commodity-to-specialty inputs sourced from qualified distributors and excipient manufacturers, with grade controlled by pharmacopeia and Pfizer specification.

Common excipient classes in atorvastatin oral tablets

  • Tablet core: fillers, binders, disintegrants, lubricants
  • Film coat: polymer system, plasticizer, pigments/colorants, anti-tacking agent
  • Packaging and labeling components: desiccant, bottle components, induction seals

What to diligence for supplier qualification

  • Supplier change control and traceability
  • Compliance with pharmacopeial specs for each excipient grade
  • Supply continuity and contamination controls (especially cross-contamination controls for allergens and manufacturing lines)

Who manufactures and bottles finished-dose Lipitor tablets under contract?

Featured snippet answer: Pfizer can manufacture internally and also uses contract manufacturing and packaging organizations (CMOs/packagers). The specific CMO for a given Lipitor NDC depends on strength, package configuration, and production campaign.

Finished-dose supply chain steps

  • Tablet compression and coating line manufacturing
  • In-process controls and final release testing
  • Primary packaging (bottles/blisters depending on NDC)
  • Secondary packaging and distribution release

Which supply-side variables drive CMO selection

  • Capacity for high-volume statin tablet production
  • Ability to meet coating uniformity and dissolution specifications
  • QA systems for change control and comparability studies

What sources of truth identify Lipitor suppliers by NDC?

Featured snippet answer: The most reliable supplier attribution is NDC-linked and can be derived from FDA-facing product listings and label-linked manufacturing sites, plus CGMP dossier references. Without those NDC-linked manufacturing-site mappings, naming specific API or excipient suppliers for “Lipitor” as a whole is not defensible.

Data artifacts that typically disclose manufacturing geography

  • FDA label manufacturing/distribution sections listing manufacturer and packager for each strength/NDC
  • Submission-linked manufacturing site listings used in NDA/ANDA supplements
  • Public FDA product listings that show firm names tied to packaging and labeling

How do generic Lipitor and Authorized-Generic supply networks compare?

Featured snippet answer: Generics and authorized generics generally rely on different API and finished-dose partners than Pfizer’s internal or CMO network. API supply may overlap across markets, but finished-dose manufacturers and packagers differ.

Why comparison matters

  • If your goal is supplier benchmarking, you need to compare at the NDC level.
  • API source can be common across competitors even when the final tablet manufacturer is different.

What supplier risks matter for atorvastatin continuity (API and finished dose)?

Featured snippet answer: Statin supply risk is driven by API batch continuity, impurity specification drift, and coating/dissolution performance. These risks show up during scale-up, supplier transitions, and regulatory filing updates.

High-impact risk events to diligence

  • API impurity excursions after process changes
  • Polymorph/crystal habit shifts in API crystallization
  • Coating failures impacting dissolution and appearance
  • Packaging component shortages affecting market availability

Can you list specific supplier companies for Lipitor’s API and finished dose?

A complete and accurate list of specific suppliers for Lipitor’s API, excipients, and finished-dose manufacturing cannot be produced from the information provided. Naming firms without NDC-linked manufacturing-site mapping or current product-specific source data would create an unreliable supplier roster.

Key Takeaways

  • Lipitor supply is multi-tier: atorvastatin API manufacturers, excipient/coating material suppliers, and finished-dose CMOs/packagers.
  • Supplier attribution must be NDC-specific to be defensible; Lipitor can use different partners by strength, package, and production campaign.
  • For due diligence and RFP-level supplier onboarding, prioritize API impurity control capability, polymorph/crystallization consistency, and coating/dissolution performance plus traceability.

FAQs

  1. How can I identify the manufacturer for a specific Lipitor NDC?
  2. What CGMP change-control documents are most relevant when qualifying a new atorvastatin API supplier?
  3. Which quality attributes of atorvastatin API most often drive supplier-related regulatory findings?
  4. How does finished-dose coating composition affect dissolution performance for atorvastatin tablets?
  5. What supplier continuity risks apply to high-volume statin tablet production during global disruptions?

References

  1. FDA. Drugs@FDA. (US). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
  2. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.