Last Updated: June 9, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for LASTACAFT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


LASTACAFT

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Abbvie LASTACAFT alcaftadine SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 022134 NDA Allergan, Inc. 0023-4290-01 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC in 1 CARTON (0023-4290-01) / 1 mL in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC 2010-11-01
Abbvie LASTACAFT alcaftadine SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 022134 NDA Allergan, Inc. 0023-4291-01 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC in 1 CARTON (0023-4291-01) / 1 mL in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC 2021-12-01
Abbvie LASTACAFT alcaftadine SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 022134 NDA Allergan, Inc. 0023-4291-05 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC in 1 CARTON (0023-4291-05) / 5 mL in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC 2021-12-01
Abbvie LASTACAFT alcaftadine SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 022134 NDA Allergan, Inc. 0023-4291-06 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC in 1 CARTON (0023-4291-06) / 5 mL in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC 2021-12-01
Abbvie LASTACAFT alcaftadine SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 022134 NDA Allergan, Inc. 0023-4291-07 2 BOTTLE, PLASTIC in 1 CARTON (0023-4291-07) / 5 mL in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC 2021-12-01
Abbvie LASTACAFT alcaftadine SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 022134 NDA Allergan, Inc. 0023-4291-10 2 BOTTLE, PLASTIC in 1 CARTON (0023-4291-10) / 5 mL in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC 2021-12-01
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Who Supplies Lastacaft (alcaftadine)? Patent and Regulatory Supply-Chain Map

Last updated: April 24, 2026

What is “Lastacaft” and who manufactures it?

Lastacaft is the brand name for alcaftadine ophthalmic solution (commonly supplied as 0.25% and 0.06% strengths depending on the market and formulation). The branded product is sold by Allergan/AbbVie in the US and other territories, with manufacturing and supply handled through Allergan’s commercial network (historically including contract manufacturing and affiliate sites).

Regulatory anchor points used to identify suppliers

For branded ophthalmics, the authoritative way to identify manufacturing suppliers is through:

  • FDA Orange Book (for listed drug, applicant/holder, and Orange Book “manufacturer” listings)
  • FDA labeling (Prescribing Information) (lists manufacturer and distributor details)
  • Drug approval package and submission history (links to applicant/holder and manufacturing sites)

Because “suppliers” can mean multiple roles (marketing authorization holder vs. manufacturer vs. distributor vs. API maker), this supply map is limited to what can be directly tied to regulatory submissions for the listed drug.

Who is the marketing authorization holder and applicant/holder?

United States (FDA Orange Book listing)

The Orange Book ties the drug to an applicant/holder and lists manufacturers for the finished dosage form. For Lastacaft, the relevant holder is Allergan (now under AbbVie corporate structure) as the brand’s regulatory owner.

Which finished-dose manufacturers are listed for Lastacaft?

Manufacturing suppliers for Lastacaft are those listed on FDA Orange Book and in the product labeling for each strength/form (for example, 0.06% vs 0.25% solution). The Orange Book typically records:

  • Finished dose manufacturers (site-level manufacturer or company listing)
  • Application/labeler responsible for the listed drug

Actionable takeaway: supplier selection for Lastacaft as an R&D or partnership target should be built from the Orange Book manufacturer list and labeling manufacturer statements for each specific strength.

API and intermediate supply: who makes alcaftadine active?

Alcaftadine API sourcing is typically split into:

  • API manufacturer(s) for the alcaftadine drug substance
  • Finished-dose contract manufacturing for the ophthalmic solution

For branded ophthalmics, finished-dose manufacturers are often easier to pin to regulatory label language than API suppliers, unless the approval documents explicitly identify drug substance manufacturers.

What supply roles matter for business decisions?

Procurement and licensing teams generally need four distinct supplier role definitions:

  1. Finished-dose manufacturer
    Company/site that produces the final alcaftadine ophthalmic solution.

  2. Labeler/holder (regulatory owner)
    The applicant or marketing authorization holder named in Orange Book and labeling.

  3. API manufacturer
    Site that produces alcaftadine drug substance.

  4. Distributor
    Entity that ships to wholesalers or channels; often aligned with the holder or logistics subcontractor.

Which documents best surface the supplier list?

Use these exact document types:

  • FDA Orange Book record for the specific Lastacaft strength (0.25% and 0.06%).
  • Prescribing Information (label front/back and “Manufactured for” / “Distributed by” sections).
  • FDA review documents if you are tracing drug substance manufacturing.

How should you structure a supplier shortlist for Lastacaft?

A defensible shortlist for contracting, due diligence, or investment diligence should separate finished-dose and API:

Finished-dose shortlist (regulatory listed manufacturers)

  • Pull every manufacturer listed for Lastacaft by strength and dosage form from the Orange Book.
  • Confirm each by matching the labeling “Manufactured by / for” statements.

API shortlist (drug substance supply)

  • Only include API suppliers that appear in FDA submissions or explicit labeling/manufacturing statements.
  • Where the record is silent, treat API supplier identification as part of the regulatory dossier review rather than procurement hearsay.

Key Takeaways

  • Lastacaft is alcaftadine ophthalmic solution; supplier identification must be anchored to FDA Orange Book manufacturer listings and prescribing information label statements for the specific strength and formulation.
  • The marketing authorization holder is Allergan/AbbVie (regulatory owner of the branded product in the US).
  • “Suppliers” split into finished-dose manufacturers, API makers, and distributors; business decisions should not blur these roles.
  • The most actionable supplier list is the Orange Book manufacturer list plus labeling confirmation per strength.

FAQs

  1. Is the supplier list the same for Lastacaft 0.06% and 0.25%?
    Not necessarily. Finished-dose manufacturing can differ by strength, packaging configuration, and revision cycles.

  2. Does the Orange Book list the API manufacturer for Lastacaft?
    Often it lists finished-dose manufacturers for the listed drug. API maker identification can require review-level submission content.

  3. Who is the labeler for Lastacaft in the US?
    The brand’s regulatory owner is Allergan/AbbVie under the Allergan product portfolio.

  4. Where do I verify the actual manufacturing supplier for the finished product?
    In the Prescribing Information labeling, typically in the “Manufactured for” / “Manufactured by” and “Distributed by” sections, and in the Orange Book entry for the listed drug.

  5. What is the best way to build a contract-manufacturing shortlist?
    Extract the Orange Book manufacturer sites for Lastacaft and validate against labeling for each strength, then layer in dossier-level review for API sourcing.


References

[1] FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (Lastacaft, alcaftadine ophthalmic solution). U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
[2] FDA. Lastacaft (alcaftadine) Prescribing Information (manufacturer/distributor statements). U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.