Last Updated: June 9, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,258,510


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,258,510
Title:Benzoheterocyclic compounds
Abstract:Novel benzoheterocyclic compounds of the formula: wherein R1 is H, halogen, alkyl, optionally substituted amino, alkoxy; R2 is H, halogen, alkoxy, phenylalkoxy, OH, alkyl, optionally substituted amino, carbamoyl-alkoxy, optionally substituted amino-alkoxy, optionally substituted benzoyloxy; R3 is a group: -NR4R5 or -CO-NR11R12; R4 is H, optionally substituted benzoyl, alkyl; R5 is a group: [R16 is halogen, optionally substituted alkyl, OH, alkoxy, alkanoyloxy, alkylthio, alkanoyl, carboxy, alkoxycarbonyl, CN, NO2, optionally substituted amino, phenyl, cycloalkyl, etc., or a group: -O-A-NR6R7; m is 0 to 3], phenyl-alkoxycarbonyl, alkanoyl, phenylalkanoyl, etc.; R11 is H or alkyl; R12 is cycloalkyl or optionally substituted phenyl; and W is a group: -(CH2)p (p is 3 to 5) or -CH=CH-(CH2)q (q is 1 to 3), the carbon atom of these groups begin optionally replaced by O, S, SO, SO2 or a group: -N(R13)- and further these groups having optionally 1 to 3 substituents of alkyl, alkoxycarbonyl, carboxy, OH, O, alkanoyloxy, etc., which have excellent vasopressin antagonistic activities and are useful as vasodilator, hypotensive agent, water diuretics, platelet agglutination inhibitor, and a vasopressin antagonistic composition containing the compound as the active ingredient.
Inventor(s):Hidenori Ogawa, Hisashi Miyamoto, Kazumi Kondo, Hiroshi Yamashita, Kenji Nakaya, Hajime Komatsu, Michinori Tanaka, Shinya Kora, Michiaki Tominaga, Yoichi Yabuuchi
Assignee: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
Application Number:US851541A
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 5,258,510: Scope, Claims, and Patent-Landscape Readout

No substantive claim or scope analysis is possible from the information provided. The prompt includes only: “The claims are:” without the actual claim text, claim numbers, or any excerpted portions of the patent document.

What is missing for claim-scope analysis

A complete and accurate scope and landscape readout requires the patent’s operative content, including:

  • Full independent claim(s) (with all limitations)
  • Full dependent claim set (or at least representative dependent claims)
  • The patent’s specification-derived definitions and embodiments that bound interpretation
  • Priority/continuity data (filing date, priority date, and any CIP/continuation chain)
  • Legal status and prosecution history signals that constrain claim construction (e.g., cancellations, amendments, final allowed wording)

What can be produced from the patent number alone (without claims/spec)

A patent number alone does not support:

  • Claim construction
  • Literal scope boundaries
  • Design-around risk mapping
  • Strength scoring by limitation coverage
  • Freedom-to-operate style relevance across competing assets

Because the operative claim text is not present, any “detailed analysis” would require invention, which is not acceptable for a patent-landscape decision process.

Key Takeaways

  • A detailed scope and claims analysis for US 5,258,510 cannot be generated from the provided input.
  • No patent-landscape conclusions can be responsibly derived without the actual claim language and related document content.

FAQs

  1. Can you analyze claim scope using only “United States Drug Patent 5,258,510” without claim text?
    No. Scope analysis depends on the specific limitations in the allowed claims and their construction.

  2. Is the patent number enough to map the landscape?
    Not in a decision-grade way. Landscape mapping needs claim themes (what is claimed) to find close variants and likely design-arounds.

  3. Would a high-level summary still be reliable?
    It would not meet a strict claim-scope requirement because “drug patent” covers multiple possible subject matters and claim structures.

  4. Can you extract claims from public records based only on the number?
    Not from the current prompt content. The assistant has not been given the claim text or document extracts needed for an analysis.

  5. What would make the analysis complete?
    The full operative claim set (independent and dependent claims) and enough specification excerpt to support key term definitions.


References

[1] None provided in the prompt.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,258,510

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,258,510

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0450097 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2009 00031 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0450097 ⤷  Start Trial SPC/GB09/037 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0450097 ⤷  Start Trial 300408 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0450097 ⤷  Start Trial 09C0049 France ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0450097 ⤷  Start Trial C300408 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.