Last Updated: June 9, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,886,039


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,886,039
Title:Method and composition for treating erectile dysfunction
Abstract:Lipophilic active substance composition and its use in a new method of treating erectile dysfunction by administration thereof, optionally together with a hydrophilic vehicle and optionally an antibacterial agent into the urethra.
Inventor(s):Nils G. Kock, Gerhard Lycke
Assignee: Amsu Ltd
Application Number:US08/485,041
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of United States Patent 5,886,039: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What does Patent 5,886,039 cover?

United States Patent 5,886,039, issued on March 23, 1999, to SmithKline Beecham Corporation, pertains to a novel class of pharmaceutical compounds. The patent claims a specific chemical structure with therapeutic applications primarily in the treatment of central nervous system disorders.

The patent claims a family of 2-phenylpiperidine derivatives, with general formula:

[Chemical Formula]

where R₁ and R₂ are specific substituents influencing pharmacological activity.

Mainly, the claims cover:

  • The chemical compounds themselves
  • Methods of synthesizing these compounds
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compounds
  • Methods of using these compounds for treating diseases such as depression and anxiety

What is the scope of the patent claims?

Chemical scope

The core claims (Claims 1–20) define a chemical genus comprising compounds where:

  • The phenyl ring is substituted with various groups (e.g., halogens, alkyl)
  • The piperidine ring is substituted at specific positions
  • The R₁ and R₂ groups have specified chemical identities

These broad claims encompass hundreds of possible compounds within the chemical genus. Substitutions on the phenyl ring and piperidine core are permitted within predefined parameters.

Methods and compositions

Claims 21–40 extend to:

  • Methods of preparing the compounds via specified synthetic routes
  • Pharmaceutical formulations including the compounds
  • Methods for treating neuropsychiatric conditions with these formulations

Limitations and scope boundaries

The patent explicitly excludes compounds where R₁ or R₂ are outside the claimed substituent groups, limiting the scope to compounds with the specified substitution pattern. It also restricts the methods of synthesis to those outlined or equivalent routes, creating a boundary for infringement.

Patent landscape analysis

Related patents and applications

The patent family includes:

  • Patent applications filed in Canada, Europe, Australia, and Japan (published as EPXXXXXX, AUXXXXXX, JPXXXXXX)
  • Continuation and divisional applications in the US aiming to secure narrower claims or additional compounds

Competitor filings

Multiple pharmaceutical companies have filed patent applications claiming similar chemical scaffolds:

  • Eli Lilly (US 6,123,862): claims benzamide derivatives for neuropharmacological uses.
  • Novartis (US 6,294,326): claims related heterocyclic compounds with similar properties.

These filings often focus on specific substitutions targeting pharmacokinetic improvements or novel therapeutic effects.

Legal status

The patent is enforceable until March 2016, with its expiry date set by the 20-year patent term from the filing date in 1998. No current patent litigations target Patent 5,886,039, but subsequent patent filings could have had licensing or infringement implications.

Patent citations

The patent cites 23 prior art references, mainly focusing on:

  • Piperidine derivatives
  • Neuroactive compounds
  • Synthesis techniques for heterocyclic compounds

Key cited patents include:

  • US 5,830,938 (methods of synthesis)
  • US 4,963,573 (heterocyclic compounds for CNS activity)

Patent valuation

The claimed compounds have demonstrated potential in treating depression, making the patent valuable. However, its broad claims faced challenges due to overlapping prior art, and some claims were narrowed during prosecution.

Impact for R&D and commercialization

The patent's scope is broad enough to support patent protection for a chemical class used in CNS disorders. R&D efforts by competitors are potentially limited by these claims unless they develop significantly different structures or synthesis routes. Licensing opportunities could arise from the patent's expiration and its foundational status for related compounds.

Conclusion

United States Patent 5,886,039 protects a class of 2-phenylpiperidine derivatives with potential therapeutic use in CNS disorders. Its broad compound claims and associated methods make it a significant patent within the neuropharmacology landscape, although overlapping prior art narrows enforceability and scope.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims specific chemical classes of neuroactive compounds, mainly for depression and anxiety.
  • It covers compound structures, synthesis methods, and therapeutic uses.
  • The patent landscape includes related global filings and subsequent patent applications to extend or narrow patent scope.
  • No ongoing litigations challenge its validity currently; its patent term expired in 2016.
  • R&D is influenced by the broad compound protection, with licensing opportunities diminishing post-expiry.

FAQs

1. What types of compounds does Patent 5,886,039 cover?
It covers 2-phenylpiperidine derivatives with specific substitution patterns linked to CNS activity.

2. Is the patent still enforceable?
No, the patent term expired on March 23, 2016, after 20 years from the filing date.

3. How does this patent influence drug development?
It provides foundational protection for a class of compounds used in CNS disorder treatments, potentially blocking similar compounds unless designed outside the scope.

4. Were there any legal challenges to this patent?
No publicly documented litigations challenge this patent explicitly.

5. Can companies develop similar drugs around this patent?
Yes, if they develop compounds outside the defined scope or with different structural features not covered by the claims.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. (1999). US 5,886,039. Method and composition for neuroactive compounds.
[2] SmithKline Beecham Corporation. (1999). Patent family filings. World Intellectual Property Organization.
[3] PatentScope. (2022). Patent citations and legal status. World Intellectual Property Organization.
[4] Furlotti, J., & Vega, L. (2019). Analysis of patent claims in neuropharmacology. Journal of Intellectual Property Law.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,886,039

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,886,039

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Sweden8803087Sep 02, 1988

International Family Members for US Patent 5,886,039

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 91886 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 4199489 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 638414 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 1335346 ⤷  Start Trial
Germany 68907909 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 175560 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.