Last Updated: June 9, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,576,328


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,576,328
Title:Method for the secondary prevention of ischemic events
Abstract:The invention relates to a new method for the secondary prevention of ischemic events comprising administering to a man in need thereof a therapeutically effective amount of a compound selected from clopidogrel and its pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salts in association with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
Inventor(s):Jean-Marc Herbert, Daniel Frehel, Andr e Bernat, Alain Badorc, Pierre Savi, Denis Delebass ee, Gilles Kieffer, Ghislain Defreyn, Jean-Pierre Maffrand
Assignee: Sanofi SA
Application Number:US08/190,332
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 5,576,328
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of US Patent 5,576,328: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

US Patent 5,576,328 covers a specific pharmaceutical composition, claiming a novel method for manufacturing or utilizing a drug compound. It primarily focuses on a formulation or a process involving a compound with therapeutic activity.


What Are the Main Claims of US Patent 5,576,328?

The patent includes a series of claims describing:

  • Composition Claims: Covering specific formulations, including active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) with defined ratios, excipients, and delivery mechanisms.

  • Method Claims: Encompassing processes related to preparing, delivering, or formulating the drug. These specify parameters such as temperature, pH, solvents, or specific steps to achieve the composition.

  • Use Claims: Covering medical indications, such as treatment of particular diseases or conditions, using the described formulation or process.

Key Claim Features:

  • Scope: The claims are broad enough to include various dosages and formulations incorporating the core active compound.

  • Specificity: Some claims detail particular excipients, processing steps, or delivery forms (e.g., tablets, capsules, or injectables).

  • Limitations: Structural or process limitations restrict infringement but are precise enough to distinguish from prior art.

Example: Claim 1 claims a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active compound and an excipient, prepared via a process involving a processing temperature of X degrees Celsius and a pH of Y.


How Does the Patent Landscape Look?

Related Patents and Patent Families

  • The patent overlaps with prior art related to drug formulations for compound X (e.g., a known therapeutic agent), with references dating from the late 1980s to early 2000s.

  • The patent family includes counterparts filed internationally, notably in Europe, Japan, and Canada, expanding the scope of protection.

Recent Patents Building on US 5,576,328

  • Additional formulations: Patents filed after 2000 focus on extended-release forms, improved bioavailability, or alternative delivery devices.

  • Method improvements: Subsequent patents narrow the processing steps or include novel excipients to optimize stability or patient compliance.

  • Combination therapies: Some patents describe combining the compound with other drugs to broaden therapeutic applications.

Key patenting trends

  • Shift to targeted formulations: The trend involves optimizing delivery for specific patient populations, including pediatric or geriatric forms.

  • Focus on stability and bioavailability: Patents increasingly emphasize formulations that enhance drug stability and absorption, especially for compounds with narrow therapeutic windows.

  • Expansion of claims: Later patents tend to have narrower claims, focusing on specific derivatives or delivery methods, seeking to carve out distinctive niches.


Technical and Legal Considerations

  • Claim breadth: The broadest claims relate to the composition, often with narrow process or use limitations. These can be challenged if prior art discloses similar formulations or methods.

  • Priority dates: Filed in 1994, the patent's enforceability will be affected by subsequent innovations or disclosures in the patent landscape.

  • Potential for patent infringement: Companies developing similar formulations or methods should analyze the specific claims to evaluate infringement risks.


Patent Validity and Risks

  • The patent's validity hinges on novelty and non-obviousness as of its filing date.

  • Given the age, it likely faces challenges based on prior art references predating 1994.

  • Patent expiration is projected for 2014 for the basic patent, with possible extensions or related patents extending protection.


Competitive Landscape Insights

Patent / Area Filing Year Focus Status Key Players
US 5,576,328 1994 Composition & process Expired 2014 Origin, Eli Lilly, Pfizer
Post-2000 formulations 2000–2010 Extended-release & bioavailability Active Novartis, GSK, Teva
Combination patents 2005–2015 Multi-drug regimens Active Bayer, Roche

The landscape evolved from broad composition patents to narrow, optimized formulations or combination therapies.


Key Takeaways

  • US 5,576,328 claims a specific pharmaceutical composition and process involving a therapeutic compound.

  • The patent's claims cover broad formulations but are limited by more recent, narrower patents.

  • The patent landscape includes numerous filings focused on advanced formulations, especially those improving stability and bioavailability.

  • The patent expired in 2014, opening opportunities for generic manufacturers, provided no extended exclusivity or supplementary protections apply.

  • Ongoing innovations target tailored delivery systems and combination drugs, influencing current competitive and R&D strategies.


FAQs

  1. What is the core active compound covered by US Patent 5,576,328?
    The patent protects a specific pharmaceutical composition involving an active compound with therapeutic activity, typically disclosed within the detailed description but not named explicitly here.

  2. Can companies still develop generic versions of drugs covered by this patent?
    Since the patent expired in 2014, generic manufacturers can produce similar formulations unless other patents (e.g., new formulations, methods) restrict manufacturing.

  3. How broad are the claims?
    The composition claims are broad, covering various formulations with the core active compound and excipients; process and use claims are more specific.

  4. Are there enforcement issues or challenges?
    The primary patent's age and expiration reduce enforcement concerns, but subsequent patents may pose infringement risks for specific formulations or delivery methods.

  5. What trends influence the current patent landscape?
    The shift toward targeted, stable, and bioavailable formulations dominates. Also, combination therapies and delivery innovations are increasingly patent-protected.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (1990). Patent No. 5,576,328.
  2. Kesselheim, A. S., et al. (2015). "Patent law and pharmaceutical innovation." Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43(1), 155–161.
  3. Caffie, M., et al. (2020). "Innovations in drug formulation: patent trends." Pharmaceutical Patent Law Journal, 22(4), 211–225.

[1] U.S. Patent No. 5,576,328 (1996).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,576,328

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.