You’re using a public version of DrugPatentWatch with 5 free searches available | Register to unlock more free searches. CREATE FREE ACCOUNT

Last Updated: May 17, 2024

Litigation Details for WhatsApp Inc. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited (N.D. Cal. 2019)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


WhatsApp Inc. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited (N.D. Cal. 2019)

Docket ⤷  Try a Trial Date Filed 2019-10-29
Court District Court, N.D. California Date Terminated
Cause 28:1331 Fed. Question Assigned To Phyllis Jean Hamilton
Jury Demand Plaintiff Referred To
Parties FACEBOOK INC.; KING & SPALDING LLP; NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED; Q CYBER TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; WHATSAPP INC.
Patents 10,000,565; 10,005,954; 10,016,415; 10,017,762; 10,029,011; 10,030,059; 10,076,698; 10,085,955; 10,111,839; 10,111,890; 10,183,994; 10,201,584; 10,309,921; 10,375,955; 10,450,343; 10,485,796; 10,485,797; 10,485,829; 10,485,844; 10,485,851; 10,485,854; 10,485,867; 10,485,894; 10,500,275; 10,539,581; 10,633,374; 6,030,623; 6,147,103; 6,166,213; 6,191,148; 6,277,584; 6,309,633; 6,369,085; 6,428,810; 6,443,860; 6,482,803; 6,514,482; 6,589,955; 6,589,960; 6,660,477; 6,660,726; 6,699,871; 6,709,867; 6,727,277; 6,759,079; 6,797,461; 6,824,482; 6,844,390; 6,864,264; 6,867,183; 6,890,904; 6,893,633; 6,960,938; 6,962,700; 6,994,847; 7,008,397; 7,022,014; 7,026,111; 7,094,737; 7,125,353; 7,141,581; 7,225,584; 7,229,618; 7,278,539; 7,371,727; 7,371,928; 7,411,070; 7,465,465; 7,485,305; 7,510,584; 7,510,726; 7,510,737; 7,514,213; 7,553,938; 7,560,276; 7,560,289; 7,694,676; 7,727,571; 7,727,720; 7,727,938; 7,737,260; 7,759,353; 7,824,774; 7,829,309; 7,842,283; 7,851,482; 7,851,504; 7,863,287; 7,867,727; 7,893,287; 7,893,324; 7,897,590; 7,897,633; 7,938,796; 7,960,371; 8,003,111; 8,003,762; 8,008,003; 8,012,465; 8,039,010; 8,067,025; 8,092,803; 8,221,763; 8,277,343; 8,278,485; 8,287,590; 8,287,851; 8,287,864; 8,287,888; 8,287,897; 8,287,928; 8,343,955; 8,343,985; 8,419,847; 8,450,287; 8,502,026; 8,586,633; 8,591,888; 8,591,890; 8,591,897; 8,591,938; 8,633,309; 8,679,621; 8,679,839; 8,709,419; 8,752,419; 8,765,680; 8,796,276; 8,809,005; 8,809,006; 8,809,010; 8,809,059; 8,829,862; 8,853,260; 8,871,938; 8,883,737; 8,883,763; 8,909,305; 8,921,374; 8,962,581; 8,962,590; 8,962,591; 8,962,680; 8,962,860; 8,980,853; 8,999,932; 9,000,021; 9,005,016; 9,005,599; 9,006,234; 9,012,501; 9,022,022; 9,023,001; 9,023,397; 9,024,007; 9,028,005; 9,028,890; 9,040,039; 9,066,942; 9,066,980; 9,107,921; 9,119,839; 9,221,867; 9,272,985; 9,284,371; 9,289,586; 9,415,004; 9,415,009; 9,415,016; 9,415,025; 9,415,029; 9,462,962; 9,482,660; 9,504,660; 9,504,699; 9,504,751; 9,539,482; 9,571,890; 9,586,960; 9,623,001; 9,623,022; 9,649,284; 9,649,305; 9,676,860; 9,693,994; 9,700,776; 9,713,621; 9,726,136; 9,737,591; 9,751,926; 9,763,797; 9,763,883; 9,763,985; 9,839,679; 9,839,693; 9,844,581; 9,851,374; 9,867,560; 9,867,797; 9,867,860; 9,867,863; 9,926,261; 9,926,324; 9,956,353; 9,962,466
Attorneys Aaron S Craig; Daniel Joseph Grooms; Elizabeth B Prelogar; Emmet P. Ong; Jessica R. MacGregor; Joseph Douglas Mornin; Joseph N Akrotirianakis; Kyle Christopher Wong; Michael Graham Rhodes; Michael R. Dreeben; Travis LeBlanc
Firms Cooley LLP; King and Spalding LLP; Long & Levit; O'Melveny & Myers LLP; United States Attorney's Office
Link to Docket External link to docket
Biologic Drugs cited in WhatsApp Inc. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited

The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , and ⤷  Try a Trial .

Details for WhatsApp Inc. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited (N.D. Cal. 2019)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
2020-03-09 29 Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Joseph D. Mornin quot;the `070 atent") U.S. Patent No. 6,147,103 October• 9, 2018 (&…960 patent, the `424 patent, the `103 patent, the `213 patent, the `148 patent, or the `810 patent -- …230 patent, Che `960 patent, the `424 patent, the `103 patent, the `213 patent, the `1~8 patent, the `810…872 patent; the `810 patent; the `085 patent; and U.S. Patent No. 5,948,789("the `789 patent"…the `960 patent, the `424 patent, the `103 patent, the `213 patent, and the `148 patent. Thus, these External link to document
2020-04-29 59 Motion to Disqualify Defense Counsel Based On Prior Representation in a Sealed v. Cobra Sols., 15 Inc., 38 Cal. 4th 839, 847 (2006). Once a substantial relationship is shown…Jessen v. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co., 20 111 Cal. App. 4th 698, 710 (2003)). Where “the evidence…issues,” a substantial relationship exists. Jessen, 111 Cal. App. 4th at 713. Once a court finds a … matter. See Sommer Decl. ¶¶ 3-4, 8-12; Jessen, 111 Cal. App. 4th at 709 6 (relationship… 1242 (N.D. Cal. 1997) (collecting cases in the patent context); see 20 also SC Innovations External link to document
2020-04-30 62 Reply to Opposition/Response Georgalis v. Facebook, Inc., 324 F. Supp. 3d 955 (N.D. Ohio 2018) ................................… Georgalis v. Facebook, Inc., 324 F. Supp. 3d 955, 960 (N.D. Ohio 2018) (rejecting jurisdiction 27 … (quoting Walden v. Fiore, 571 U.S. 277, 284-85 (2014)). 9 i. WhatsApp’s TOS. Plaintiffs…contract requiring 28 “marketing and sale of . . . patents” in California, “recordkeeping, bookkeeping, accounting…reporting” to California entity, and “payment of patent royalties” to California entity). REPLY External link to document
2020-05-29 79 REDACTED Opposition In re Marriage of Zimmerman, 16 Cal.App. 4th 556, 565 (1993) ..........................................…In re Marriage of Zimmerman, 16 Cal.App. 4th 556, 565 (1993). Mr. Mezzina was not called …They did not: the first involved TWiT’s alleged patent infringement while 17 … communications the firm had regarding the patent litigation were “immaterial” to the breach of …Cal.App.4th 752, 759 (2005) ............ 10 10 H.F. Ahmanson External link to document
2020-05-29 83 Opposition/Response to Motion In re Marriage of Zimmerman, 16 Cal.App. 4th 556, 565 (1993) ..........................................…In re Marriage of Zimmerman, 16 Cal.App. 4th 556, 565 (1993). Mr. Mezzina was not called …They did not: the first involved TWiT’s alleged patent infringement while 17 … communications the firm had regarding the patent litigation were “immaterial” to the breach of …Cal.App.4th 752, 759 (2005) ............ 10 10 H.F. Ahmanson External link to document
>Date Filed >Document No. >Description >Snippet >Link To Document

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.